[QUOTE=AmirMourad;60902]“I think very important to be yourself for teaching meditation.”
It is rarely ever the case that one is oneself - because that would require one who has already come to know oneself, through and through. That is why to teach meditation - you yourself must be in a state of meditation. Otherwise what you are teaching is not meditation, but information. Information can be transmitted, but meditation cannot be transmitted through information. There is a teaching which is far more spontaneous, direct, and natural which is a living force of it’s own - but it has nothing to do with words, having nothing to do with knowledge. It is the very presence of the inexpressible. Becoming a vessel for this presence - and anybody who is receptive enough can fall into communion with it. And this is what has been called the mind to mind transmission. Unless such a transmission happens - then one may be passing information, which may be effective to a certain extent, but it can never transmit the spirit of meditation. This is how certain masters - without a single piece of instruction, can just with a glance look at a disciple, and if the disciple sits for meditation at that time, he will be able to enter into meditation almost effortlessly. Because while your intellect may not understand this wordless language, it can be grasped by your intuition. When this happens - the same state of consciousness starts becoming mirrored in you.
Unless one has integrated meditation as a natural expression of one’s being - then one may be passing off information and instruction, but one is not teaching meditation. Because meditation cannot be taught - there is something else which is far more essential, which is a silence that starts happening once you are receptive to something beyond your intellect.[/QUOTE]