[QUOTE=thomas;45982]The normal and fair thing to do would be to cite any verse you are referring to, for the sake of the readers of the post.
If it exists, that’s an easy enough thing to do.
If I were like you and were looking for dirt in the Hindu scriptures, which I would not do, as I would rater look for the positive and reflect on it, and if I found something questionable, I would not just say that the Hindu scriptures says so-and-so, but would quote it word for word.
How else would anyone know whether it was true or whether I just made it up, or heard about it on an anti-Hindu site?
But what you have said cannot possibly be true, since Catholicism does not definitively declare that ANYONE is in Hell, or never declare anyone predisposed to Hell, especially an innocent child.
Of course if you refuse to quote the scriptures, you can say it says anthing at all, and maybe get away with letting a distortion or outright falsehood stand, as SD has done with his claim that the Bible condones beastialty, when in fact it condemns it.
Is this intellectual honesty?[/QUOTE]
Been there, done that.
There are very few good apples in the orchard that is the Bible, compared to Hindu scriptures.
You could look it up yourself. Actually, there are several verses I have heard (and seen) of that mention predisposition to Hell for certain groups and so forth. Then again, there’s the fact that I forget which interpretation a certain sect of Christianity holds for those kinds of verses at times.
Intellectual honesty? In your example, no it is not. Then again, what about all those Christians who go around defaming other religions, converting “heathens” by spreading lies and misinformation on their own religions and pretending to be one of them, and etc? Is that intellectual honesty? Is it acceptable because Christianity is gaining more converts? These kinds of Christians are far more numerous than you can imagine in your cozy home in America.