Reply to InnerAthlete
Were those photos Asanas? I am going to post a small extrat from our main book which is called Swasthya Y?ga Shastra. It talks about Asanas and was writen by Master DeRose, who has been practicing and teaching the Ancient Y?ga for nearly 50 years.
?SANA
FIRM AND PLEASANT CORPORAL TECHNIQUE
?sana is any position that is firm and pleasant (sthira sukham ?sanam). This is the broad and laconic definition from the Y?ga S?tra, chapter II, 46. According to this definition, the number of ?sanas is infinite.
Another definition, this one attributed to Shiva, confirms that of P?ta?jali: there are as many ?sanas as there are human beings on the face of the Earth.
Others, however, limit the number of ?sanas to 84,000, of which 840 are the most important and, of these, only 84 are considered fundamental. In the current book, we present 2,000 ?sanas. It is the largest compilation yet achieved in the history of Y?ga in the world.
But, what is an ?sana after all? ?sana is the corporal technique that, for many people, is the most prevalent stereotype of Y?ga. This is due to the fact that, among all the techniques of Y?ga, the only one which is photographable, filmable and able to be demonstrated in public is ?sana. It is possible to photograph y?ganidra, film pr?n?y?ma or demonstrate mudr? but it is of little. As a result of these facts, this anga has ended up being the one which is most well-known.
?sana is corporal technique, yes, but it is not exclusively corporal. It has nothing to do with gymnastics or physical education. Its origins are different, its purposes are different and the methods of executing it are different. This is why, in Y?ga, we do not need many things that are fundamental in Physical Education like, for example, muscular warm ups. In Ancient Y?ga, we do not use this before executing ?sanas.
In order to economize on words, people tend to refer to ?sanas exclusively through a corporal prism. Yet, any technique does not deserve the name ?sana unless it incorporates other elements.
If it is physical exercise, it is not Y?ga. In order for a technique to be considered an ?sana, it must have the following three elements:
- Position;
- Coordinated breathing; and
- Interior attitude.
The position needs to be:
a) stable;
b) comfortable; and
c) aesthetic.
The breathing needs to be:
a) conscious;
b) profound (abdominal and complete); and
c) with rhythm.
The interior attitude needs to have:
a) localization of consciousness throughout the body;
b) mentalization of images, colors and sounds; and
c) bh?va (deep sentiments or reverence).
This is what we think about asana and it is how we achieve those asanas so easily. It was not intended to be an advertisiment. You may take it out anytime you want. I do not even have time to handle all the private students and classes that I give in New York. Sorry about that.
Of course I would not trade my experience for a young body. I had my way, I am here, exactly where I supposed to be. I don’t want to judge anyone.