I would tend to go along with the angle Benthino articulated here…hahahahah.
If you think you need it, you need it; If you don’t, you don’t.
Depends on what you mean by initiation, a transference of spirtual energies perhaps.
I tend to see it as a number of people or perhaps just one(,it may be quite memorable or not) blowing directly on the fire of your bhakti.Instead of embers you’ve got a raging fire,perhaps temporarily… But you must do the work you can do yourself(once you’ve left this company or that gurur or whatever).No one’s going to do that for you.The external guru lights or fires up your bhakti.The rest is up to you.
You need bhakti,spiritual desire.Enough of that and it probably matters much less which school of kriya yoga or path you’ve chosen.Not so sure about inititation.Personally i would regard it with susupicion is my gut-feeling, if people insistent on it being a must,which is not to say it is’nt very useful to some people.
I agree with Benthino it is a limting mind-structure but i disagree with him when he suggests (elswhere) that all methods can be discarded(yes maybe eventually) and we all just need to rest in pure awareness.This might work for some folk that are laready ripe but it won’t work for everyone.Chances are indeed that it won’t work for most folk,not unless they’ve already done a certain amount of (spiritual) work or effort beforehand.
The suggesstion is inititation is an essential ingredient in transmission.It’s just a another of those words to me which could mean a number of things ranging from physical contact to invisible contact…
I think it would be over-dogmatic and prescriptive to attach too much significane about any imagined role and importance it might have on anyone’s " spiritual journey".I prefer the more update modern tek on these things but i am still highly respectful and reverential towards what the ancients have handed down.Withoutthem and the last 5000years or so we’d have pretty much nothing.The ancient scriptures hold much authority,probably why they’ve surivived,being supposedly divinely inspired from the source.It’s always good to question limiting mind and belief structures that keep us remaining tethered to our current state of evolution.It’s interesting that one’s own evolution is (most likely) dependent on everyone else’s.That actually makes sense.
Initiation.Depends what you mean by ‘initiation’.
Alot of yogic practices are buried in scripture. Why were some just preserved orally then?And have they survived?.Was it thought that teachings could end up corrupted or altered by folk adopting them?.I’m not that clear on this- why if oral preservation might have been favoured over textual preservation,if that was the case?..Because it was feared texts could be re-written aand any value lost?.On paper at least, it would seem more likely to be lost if there was no living person to pass it onto.Things have been lost,& later re-discovered &revived.I think in the information age where where most of us can scrutinise everything and google,this is not gonna happen.
My gut-feeling is that most of yoga does’nt strictly need a sriptural authority(or one outside of oneself) or an external guru in the flesh to point the way.Maybe this is like a major new shift in the way spirtual ‘transmission’ is now occurring in the modern age.The way IN is in.
Initiation kind of suggests you’re joinning a clan which some folk might find very helpful on their journey.
And if you google or go to amazon,i’m pretty sure you can find manuals or kriya yoga.Alof of it surely is written down.Just that most of us neither have the inclination ,the energy or the bhakti to pursue it fervently as usually required.