[quote=Tyler Zambori;17447]Ok the reason I’m bringing this up is to show how this is not scientific. It is anecdotal. We use the glucose meter to check the results of what we do, and we use objective observations to
do it, but it is not scientific. we even share pub med articles amongst ourselves, but it is still not scientific. We would just say we are tweaking our own diabetes management regimens. It is just a technique for us. It is anecdotal evidence![/quote]
Namaste Tyler,
Yes, you are right, it isn’t very scientific and it is a technique, but what you seem to forget is that before that self testing technique was available, there was a whole team of scientists who worked on this self testing to make it easy to use and more accessable to diabetics. So behind it was some scientific application. How it is discussed, applied and studied by diabetics, that might not be scientific.
The same with yoga and ayurveda. There were yogis and practitioners who nearly 8000 years or more ago tested certain herbal remedies and apply them and they either got better or they died, that was their science, and that science rendered a healing modality which we can safely use and apply today. Wether we think it was scientific or not, who are we to judge what is to be considered scientific just because it doesn’t agree with some of our norms and what we think scientific is.The same with yoga. Some yogis applied this and that pose and they studied the effects of it closely on the human body and consciousness, some were modified and some were discarded, but in the end what we have today is a system that has value for some people, wether they view as a science or not, point is, it has value.
The software programme has value for you up to a point, but then you need more. Your problem seems to be that you can’t get more and that there are few sources who are prepared to give you more. Perhaps these sources are not the right channels and you are barking up the wrong tree, have that ever occured to you? Perhaps you need to explore a different way to get the info you need. The same with yoga and the spiritual path. I had many instances in my life already where I felt that nobody around me is able to offer me what I need to know. And now comes that wonderful thing we call hindsight. Looking back I can see that I wasn’t ready at that point to recieve the necessary info, even if I did received it then, it would have been meaningless for me. But the wonder is that the info did came to me at the right time and point in my life and it was amazing what effects it had. So, some patience here might go a long way in helping you to get what you want. Life and spiritual life and yoga is not a MacDonalds drive-thru, it is not instant. You work for it and earn it most of the time, the hard way.
About poetry. Wether we like it or not, point is we cannot change history. There was a point in our human history where most of the great works of this world was written in poetic language and aphorisms. The challenge for us today is to make sense of those aphorisms and poetry and to see the value of it for yourself. I cannot offer you an easy way out here, what I can say it does get better with time, once you are used to read it, it does start to make sense and your understanding of their meaning and their value grow with you understanding of poetry and aphorisms. Commentaries are meant to make it easier for us, but it is not meant to be your truth, amidst all the commentaries you still need to find your own truth and that in itself might be a frustration.
Tyler, I hope this might add some light for you to a very difficult time. If you are interested in yoga as a science, Swami Sivananda of the Divine Life Society wrote 8 volumes on yoga as a science called: Science of Yoga. Swami Sivananda had very little contact with the West, in fact it was his disciples after his death in 1963 who took his teachings to West. So very little of that proselyting aspect to the West is in his books.