It may be helpful to think about mandalas that align that fit in the correct largeness range and even design type qualities specification. The supercomputing body may have many components creating solutions that each have a task of interest or object of interest and there is a number of those things and even cognition numbers for what the qualities of each are that need to be added to the range number for mandala design and also those qualifications may need to be ingrained by adding those qualities as further specific designs of the mandala fractal, and the number of things (philosophical word) needs to be not so large that it would be large enough to make its function unhelpful as the relativity of the code would be microscopic and the scaling searching and zooming would be too much dot connecting and more than just packaging.
For practicing mini reasoning of the meathods evolutionary state peaking in core philosophy at alignment and timing of the complex version structure timing chaos alignment, think of the square scales sensing being sensitive to the teeter tottering which is easily prominent and imagine the time it takes to let a scale tip, suspended away from a surface plane being opposite to one of the three that are not suspended and are touching the ground, to touch the ground and think about the alignment of that scales journey to the final displacement which is somewhere on that surface and in a basic way it would be below the otherwise not moving scales or environment or example or it would be the same scale or from the same linear composition/fractal/sequence/rhythm.
I just force ejected the bread I broke out of the toaster and they flew up and both landed in the same one. Ahahahahahahahahahahaha