5 Tibetans vs SRF 38

Yoga Discussion General Yoga
#1

The 5 Tibetans (aka Rites of Rejuvenation) are discussed many times on this site. There appears to be a small industry built up around it, commentaries, classes etc.

The Self Realization Fellowship (SRF) has a set of 38 energization exercises that can be considered similar.

During one period in the past, I did the 5 Tibetans (omitting the 6th) for 3 months everyday, and always felt good afterward. However, I was hoping for something more directly tangible with respect to “spiritual progress”.

During another period in the past, I did the SRF 38, followed by SRF’s level 1 kriya. My experience of the third eye is substantially more consistent and clear when the 38 is done before hand.

Drawing a parallel between the “5” and the “38” suggests that the “5” are a warmup for something, but what is that something?

Has anyone incorporated the 5 Tibetans into a larger sadhana where they became an essential step?

#2

I’ve found another series of exercises called the Magical Passes, a form of tai chi practiced by Mexican shaman and taught by Carlos Castaneda.

#3

However, I was hoping for something more directly tangible with respect to “spiritual progress”.

And what might that be?

#4

When I wrote that, I guess I was questioning the effectiveness of the techniques for me, at my state of evolution.

I am interested in other peoples experiences with those techniques.

I’m not sure how they work and have to take it on faith that long term they would be good for me.

Everyone interested in spiritual growth should evaluate their sadhana and if your efforts with a technique don’t gain traction, maybe you should move on.

My concept of spiritual progress is related to the depth of peace I experience when using a particular technique and how well I manage during the day away from the cushion.

Thank you for your reply.

#5

Everyone interested in spiritual growth should evaluate their sadhana and if your efforts with a technique don’t gain traction, maybe you should move on.
Couldn’t agree more. Though for me “committed to” replaces “interested in”.