Is Yoga Hinduism?

[QUOTE=dharma66;45107]Tell that to the Muslims whose Mosques are burned down in India.[/QUOTE]

I am seriously starting to entertain notions of your being one of those “secular” Hindus, unconsciously influenced by Christian/Western idealism, who only takes note of “Hindu” crimes and skims over the missionary activity and cultural subversion in India, and the reasons why reprisal acts are taking place. Can you explain the Pakistani destruction of 200+ Hindu temples after the Babri Masjid was destroyed by Hindus? And where did you get your info of Hindu burning of Masjids? A Christian/Muslim fundamentalist/apologist website? What about the terror attacks on the Taj Mahal hotel? No comments? They were fighting for their god and that makes it just, right? They were tired of the Kashmir issue, so their wanton murdering of almost 200 people makes it OK, right? What about the offensive info on Hinduism in history textbooks today (along with the fact that the Aryan Invasion Theory is still used in Western textbooks), which Hindus in the California history textbook ordeal attempted to rectify (but failed in ameliorating the most controversial information, like the Aryan invasion theory, due to the combined efforts of racist historians and anti-Hindu groups who cried afoul)? Is that acceptable? What about the almost daily dissemination of deceitfully innocent “information” on India which depicts it as nothing more than a idol-worshiping, casteist, and poor country? What about the manner in which a single “Hindu” animal sacrifice was gloated over in the media when Muslims slaughter rams daily for their sustenance? What about the 9-11 attacks? What about the Taliban? What about the false anti-Indian cables released by Pakistani government? What about the way in a Muslim in Malaysia chopped of the head of a Ganesh idol? What about the way many Muslim countries banned yoga? What about the Muslim massacres of those “infidels” when they led “excursions” into India, which some estimates indicate millions of Hindus slaughtered? What about their destruction of Hindu temples and their looting of its wealth? What about the countless other anti-Hindu actions/material that you obviously did not cover because you were too busy looking at anti-Hindu news websites? But all these events are supposedly not a part of Islam’s teachings and yet one isolated anti-Muslim action one “Hindu” took is indicative of Hinduism being non-violent? I would love to see you post your drivel on the Hindu Dharma forums. You would be hounded to a degree far more severe than mine or Surya Deva’s comments.

Now, one interesting thing I noticed is that SD stated “Bhakti Hinduism also has to go”. Surya, can you explain me why you think this is so or rather what you understand by this term? Bhakti as I know it (It’s Bhakti Jim, but not as we know it ):
Bhakti (for Thomas : Love) is the shortcut yoga whereby via surrendering to God (isvara pranidhana), via Love for God, one can attain enlightenment. The advantage is, that you don’t have to go through all the steps of the heavy ashtanga (eightfold) yoga. The disadvantage is, that it is the most difficult form of Yoga. Can’t see what is wrong with it, except for the fact that people may think there is an easy way to attain enlightenment and thus obviate the heavy ashtanga Yoga. That is simply a misconception: Isvara pranidhana is the most difficult part and I personally think that if you (i.e. a normal person) don’t go through all the 8 steps, you won’t get there either. I think it is via ashtanga yoga, that Bhakti can be achieved. Those who have apparently been able to take this path as a shortcut, probably have gone through the other steps in previous lives. What do you think?
Or do you consider Bhakti to be a sign of weakness, just like good old Friedrich Nietzsche (not the “Nietzsche” of this forum) considered charity etc. to be a sign of weakness?

I think as you understand Bhakti it is fine. If you understand Bhakti as love for the divine self, the ultimate reality. This is good. One needs to have unwaivering devotion to the divine within themselves. Like I said, I call the divine “Baba” meaning the most beloved.

However as soon as we externalise that divine by worshipping some deity outside of us using idols and temples that is when the problems start. First we need to understand why we are doing this, we are doing this because we need an image to worship, because we find it hard to work with abstract notions like self, infinite and one. We personalize it giving it name, form and shape. But this is a weakness. A rational and scientific human being does not require these images. They can easily work with abstract notions of infinite, self and one. It has been admitted in the Agamas(the texts that prescribe bhakti rituals) that idols are only because people of Kaliyuga find it hard to work with abstract notions.

Ultimately, we know that Sadguna Brahman is a man-made invention. Nirguna Brahman is the real Brahman that we understand by the abstract satchitananda: truth, being and consciousness. If you work with Nirguna Brahman, then there is no way you can distort it. There is only way to work Nirguna Brahman and that is through the path of jnana. However, if you work with Sadguna Brahman you can easily distort it. You can start to develop an obsession for the image, and lapse into ritualism. Then rather than becoming a spiritual person, you become a religious person. You wake up everyday to do puja of your idol in the very particular way(n number of rotations of the puja plate, n number of mantra chants, sprinkling of holy water, lighting of incense) then you go to the temple to sing hymns to your idol.

I have met many hardcore Bhakti people and a lot of what they do borders on superstition to me. Like observing rituals like going up and down stairs of a temple a 1000 times. Observing 30 day fasts with only water. Chanting the name of the lord through the day(japa) Some of these people are very pure bhaktas and you are highly touched by their innocence and love. However, it is these people that fall prey to superstitions, like the ones you mentioned earlier.

The path of Bhakti is similar to creating a fantasy and then falling in love with your fantasy. The Vaishnava falls in love with Krishna/Vishu/Rama, the Shaiva falls in love with Shiva/Shambu/Rudra. The Shakta falls in love with Kali/Durga/Amba. Invariably, what ends up happening is rivalry starts to develop between the different sects. They start to slight each other

Unfortunately, Bhakti IS what is wrong with Hinduism today. Hinduism has become a religion of polytheism, ritualism and superstition. The average Hindu is just as naive as his Abrahamic counterpart. Most Hindus do not even read the Gitas and Upanishads, they listen to stories from Puranas and go to temples to worship and to sing hymns.

The Bhakti path therefore breeds polytheism, ritualism, superstition and secetarianism. Hence why I said that it needs to go, along with the Abrahamic religions. It has no place in a scientific and rational world. However, the Jnana path has every right to be in a scientific world.

There is only one way and that is meditation. This gets rid of the diverse sects. In a Vedic world everybody will be following exactly the same path of Jnana. Everybody will be doing exactly the same methods of Yoga and meditation. In a Vedic world there would be no temples anywhere, just sacred spaces like natural springs, forests, mountains, meadows and meditation halls. There would be spiritual homogenity.

Diversity breeds conflict. Unity brings harmony, peace and love. A vedic world is a no-nonsense world, it is a purely scientific and rational world. It is one which is based on living in union with the laws of nature. It is one where the main values of society are health and education. A world where people are noble. This was how it was during Vedic times.

Can you see you how my utopia is no utopia at all? It is just a scientific world without the beliefs, mysticism, superstition, agendas. You cannot go wrong in a scientific world because by living in accordance with the laws of nature you live in harmony. This is what is meant by a dharmic world.

We are already moving in that direction because of science. Now we know for example that living in certain ways produces suffering. We realise that how we once lived in the West in premodern times without proper sanitation systems, without awareness of hygeine, and bad diet and lifestyle produced plagues, disease and lowered our lifespan. Today, we realise the virtue of sanitation, hygeine, diet, lifestyle. We are learning yet another lesson today how our erosion of the ecosystems of this planet and unbrideled exploitation of its resources is affecting the climate and environment. Now we are becoming aware of how living green and ecofriendly is a virtue.

Similarly, as we continue to progress and understand the laws of the mind we will begin to realise how our thinking habits leads to so much destruction, hatred, war, crime, greed, lust, anger, fear and evil and realise the virtue of the restraint of mind and overcoming egoic living. Again, we are already moving towards that with the proliferation of Yoga.

Science naturally leads its way to a Vedic world. Ever since the age of reason began we have been slowly, but surely moving back into a Vedic world. However, there are obstacles in our way to realising a Vedic world and that is the old paradigm of an Abrahamic world which has kept us in the dark ages for so long. It continues to this very day in the form of evangalism and Islamic terrorism and capitalism. It is easy to see this world is in a dire state by taking one glance at it. Most of the worlds population lives in poverty, lacks clean drinking water, education. Most places in the world are ravaged by wars and conflict. Today, even the Western countries are tasting poverty, riots, lack of education.

We must identify the cause of this and if anybody is truly honest with themselves they will identify the Abrahamic ideology as the cause. Remove the cause and end the suffering. Replace it with a new world system that works. It really is that simple.

Dharma, Nietzche is making some good points there. What about it? Why do you only notice the few and isolated cases of Hindu violence, but ignore the rampant violence, death and destruction against Hindus?

What about the thousands of our temples, libraries and places of learnings which have been wiped out by Muslims? What about the tens of millions of Hindus that were brutally massacred by Muslims? What about the rape of India by the British? Where is our compensation in the trillions of dollars which have been looted from our country? Where is the compensation for hundreds of millions of poor Indians who are poor and illiterate today because of the British? Where is the rectification of the distortions made to our history and heritage?

Every Western friend I have talked to has told me that India and Hinduism is always portrayed as a poor, superstitious and castist country. Even they notice the staggering amount of prejudice and propogananda against India

What about us?

[QUOTE=Surya Deva;45135]Dharma, Nietzche is making some good points there. What about it? Why do you only notice the few and isolated cases of Hindu violence, but ignore the rampant violence, death and destruction against Hindus?

What about the thousands of our temples, libraries and places of learnings which have been wiped out by Muslims? What about the tens of millions of Hindus that were brutally massacred by Muslims? What about the rape of India by the British? Where is our compensation in the trillions of dollars which have been looted from our country? Where is the compensation for hundreds of millions of poor Indians who are poor and illiterate today because of the British? Where is the rectification of the distortions made to our history and heritage?

Every Western friend I have talked to has told me that India and Hinduism is always portrayed as a poor, superstitious and castist country. Even they notice the staggering amount of prejudice and propogananda against India

What about us?[/QUOTE]

It is as I have said before; Christians and Muslims look at the present conditions of countries today as a justification for their actions. For example, they look at India as see the “rampant” poverty and superstition as a justification to covert Hindus from Hinduism and, in the case of Islamic fundamentalists, kill them. Christians look at the U.S and say it is in its present state because of Christianity (I do not hesitate to tell them this country was not found on theocratic ideals but secular and democratic ideals which are antithetical to Christianity). They do not even take into account the regression of civilization they caused in India. Now we Indians must alone take on the task of rebuilding India into its former grandeur. However, I do not resent the daunting task. In fact, there is much India’s people can gain culturally, socially, intellectually, and religiously from the noble task of eliminating poverty and ignorance; one of which is never to trust religions that are entirely irreconcilable with the incumbent and swiftly defeat it through strong intellectual awareness. I.E, if one preaches tolerance towards all and the other intolerance towards particular groups…

So how long will it be until India is no longer a victim and can no longer blame all their problems on the evil Muslims and Christians?

A Christian/Muslim fundamentalist/apologist website?

Interesting that Christians and Muslims are the same thing to certain Hindus.

From my perspective, we are worlds apart, though I don’t diss Muslims. I don’t diss any religion. To diss other religions seems to be a Hindu thing, juding by this board.

Similarly, as we continue to progress and understand the laws of the mind we will begin to realise how our thinking habits leads to so much destruction, hatred, war, crime, greed, lust, anger, fear and evil and realise the virtue of the restraint of mind and overcoming egoic living. Again, we are already moving towards that with the proliferation of Yoga.

What is wrong with lust? You speak of fornication as if it is a virtue, and not a sin or immoral.

Well, a few decades. Not an easy thing to undo the damage Christians and Muslims have done for almost a millennium.

Well in that case, I put them in the same category because both preach intolerance towards other religions and both are from the same branch of religions. And if dissing other religions seems to be a Hindu thing, then I am afraid you need to step out and look at Christians for what they are. Here’s a starting point:

http://forums.carm.org/v/index.php (go to the Hinduism section as before).

I could post millions of other links and cite personal evidence and observations but that would be a waste of time.

OK, I stand corrected. On THIS board it is the Hindus who continually put-down other religions. The Christians don’t, and I don’t associate with Christians who do. I don’t know that kind of Christian.

My religion does NOT teach me to be intolerant of other religions, and I defy you find any Catholic doctrine that proves otherwise. It is my religion which has helped me to see the good in other religions, and I am more tolerant now because of it than I was before I accepted Catholicism.

There’s no way I’m wading through that forum to find Hindu-bashing. There are too many threads. And it’s too frustrating to see the fundies bashing Catholics with the usual misunderstandings and misrepresentations.

It’s just a message board anyway, and no way to get a real cross-section of any group. Likewise I cannot get a clear picture of Hindus from this board, either, so my hope remains that Hindus in general are tolerant and cheerful.

[QUOTE=Surya Deva;45130]I think as you understand Bhakti it is fine. If you understand Bhakti as love for the divine self, the ultimate reality. This is good. One needs to have unwaivering devotion to the divine within themselves. Like I said, I call the divine “Baba” meaning the most beloved.

We must identify the cause of this and if anybody is truly honest with themselves they will identify the Abrahamic ideology as the cause. Remove the cause and end the suffering. Replace it with a new world system that works. It really is that simple.[/QUOTE]
As regards Bhakti we agree then. I also reject the idolatry approach based on worshipping images. For instance when reading the books of the A.C.Bhaktivedanta Book Trust (the Hare Krishna) movement I was very suprised to recognise therein a tone of coercion. A tone of demanding obedience. It reminded me very much of my youth in Christianity and I did not like it at all.
That said, not all forms of Christianity are the same. Where I think that Lutherian protestantism and Judaeism have an advantage over catholicism (I’m not attacking you personally, Thomas) is the fact that they reject worshipping of images and statues. Catholicism, like certain forms of (distorted) Hinduism, has always given me the impression of a puppet show.
The approach of most religions in general where only the form counts (confession, rituals, communion in the sense of only eating the Eucharist without knowing what it means, the useless and needless slaughtering of animals for the sake of sacrifice (Islam, but also in early Hinduism; this was why Buddha rejected the old Brahmanism) etc., going to the church, mandir or mosque) but where there is no content in the heart of the “believers” (where it’s just a way of socialising, the establishing of a group meme; the establishment of a "we"and “they”)- all these forms of what people usually understand as “religion”, is no religion at all! It is seeking an excuse to continue bad behaviour because by confessing God will forgive you. This cannot be the right approach. Only by a sincere inquiry into oneself one can come to the ultimate truth. The rest is panem et cirences.

[QUOTE=thomas;45151]OK, I stand corrected. On THIS board it is the Hindus who continually put-down other religions. The Christians don’t, and I don’t associate with Christians who do. I don’t know that kind of Christian.

My religion does NOT teach me to be intolerant of other religions, and I defy you find any Catholic doctrine that proves otherwise. It is my religion which has helped me to see the good in other religions, and I am more tolerant now because of it than I was before I accepted Catholicism.[/QUOTE]

Then do you reject the OT part of the bible? There it very clearly gives an injunction to kill idolators and worshippers of other gods.

I am not just putting down your religion, I am putting down a lark chunk of my own religion too. We don’t need them anymore in our modern world. Your religion teaches false doctrines and false methods to get salvation. It useless to humanity.

Science is useful to humanity. Catholicism is not.

There is no place in the Bible that is telling the readers of the Bible to do those things.

Where I think that Lutherian protestantism and Judaeism have an advantage over catholicism (I’m not attacking you personally, Thomas) is the fact that they reject worshipping of images and statues.

No, Catholics do not worship statues or images. I once believed that myself, though, in my pre-Catholic days.

[QUOTE=thomas;45174]There is no place in the Bible that is telling the readers of the Bible to do those things.[/QUOTE]

:lol: Haha! HAHAHA!

[QUOTE=Nietzsche;45183]:lol: Haha! HAHAHA![/QUOTE]

Give me an example, please.

[QUOTE=thomas;45152]There’s no way I’m wading through that forum to find Hindu-bashing. There are too many threads. And it’s too frustrating to see the fundies bashing Catholics with the usual misunderstandings and misrepresentations.

It’s just a message board anyway, and no way to get a real cross-section of any group. Likewise I cannot get a clear picture of Hindus from this board, either, so my hope remains that Hindus in general are tolerant and cheerful.[/QUOTE]

It is the forums for the Christian Apologetics Research Ministry. The one place where you can find the most idiocy and ignorance in such a tiny part of the internet. The Christians there are true Christians, who take the Bible to their hearts and its teachings literally. They aren’t influenced by secular ideals (although they may point to these as the reason why Christianity is superior :lol:).

[QUOTE=thomas;45184]Give me an example, please.[/QUOTE]

I could quote what you guys have repeatedly told Surya Deva and I; (albeit in an economical manner) “We have told you this a million times and still you do not listen.”

[QUOTE=Nietzsche;45192]I could quote what you guys have repeatedly told Surya Deva and I; (albeit in an economical manner) “We have told you this a million times and still you do not listen.”[/QUOTE]

Then my assertion stands.

There is nothing in the Bible that is telling the READER of the Bible to kill anyone.

There is nothing in Christian dogma that tells Christians to kill anyone.

Any claims to that effect are ignorant and bogus.

[QUOTE=thomas;45193]Then my assertion stands.

There is nothing in the Bible that is telling the READER of the Bible to kill anyone.

There is nothing in Christian dogma that tells Christians to kill anyone.

Any claims to that effect are ignorant and bogus.[/QUOTE]

Did you use Christian (il)logic again? Were, in my post, did you find the ideas necessary to formulate this syllogism? Let me translate my previous post into a statement a Christian can understand:

We have told you the verses. The Bible sanctions intolerance and the killing of heretics. Go check them out. Accept it and realize the Truth or reject it and act like a typical Christian.