Mixing paths and techniques

Do you think it is advisable to mix paths and techniques in ones spiritual journey by mixing and matching? In the traditional spiritual culture one woud commit to one path and practice whatever was prescribed and do nothing else. In the modern age, where we are exposed to every other path, we learn about other ways and techniques.

In my spiritual practice I try out various kind of meditations from various traditons. Sometimes I do moving meditations. I do self-analysis, candle gazing, japa and ajapa meditation, all kinds of pranayama, concentration exercises, Yoga Nidra, astral projection, visualizations and introspection. I have constructed this routine from mixing and matching from various traditions I learned from.

Do you think it is better to just stick to one path and the techniques it prescribes?

What I have found that works for me (and may not at all suit you) is to both do some sampling, see what has efficacy for my living and what does not, AND find a particular path. That is not to say “a particular path” cannot evolve over time (and it should).

I spent a good deal of time sampling various elements of yoga practice from various lineages, teachers, etcetera. And, when we have lifted (at least somewhat) our veil of ignorance (that which is classified as avidya by patanjali) then we can discern what is for us very effectively.

The problem can be that when the veil has not been lifted, acknowledged, processed, then the mind can simply convince us that shoving finger nail clippings in the left nostril is part of the spiritual path - in much the same way that some are convinced that doing sarvangasana flat on the floor is in the best interest of the student’s physical body (cervical spine). The mind can convince us of anything and so there must be a precursory and ongoing process of sifting through our own fog.

I believe that as long as the sampling is not for sampling itself but for the purpose of truly moving closer to spirit, then it is lovely. Otherwise, like many things it can just be a white washed manifestation of ego. And this, based only on my own experiences. How it shakes out for you I cannot say.

I think it might be easy to get stuck on a path that is’nt as well tailored for You, is’nt serving you as best as it could. I think every path will deliver though with sufficent bhakti, i.e spiritual desire.If they are hungry enough the means become less. Hoewver yoga is a science of cause & effect that will open us up on all levels.

I would say get really familar with one path.Then if you’d identified shortcomings in that path for you, then have the courage to look outside that path & indeed at other paths…Dependency on a particular path,cult,organisation or any particular guru is unlikely a good thing.Also bear in mind the only path is the one you’re on.The rest are like major roads that others share with you, they intersect like major arteries in the vast body of yoga.

Rather than take one deep meditation technique from one school and combine with a number from others. It seems you can be creative & say use one system’s pranayama kriya yoga with another’s meditation or mantra yoga but it think that person will have that question answered and feel comfortable doing that…So obviously if they complement each other fine. You want a decent knowledge & good primer on the mechanisms and dynamics involved in Kundalini or life-force awakening.To me safety is largely tied in to the self-pacing principle, that we pace the openings in our journey.

I think we can get overly attached to one way of doing things and indeed one way of looking at things and that may indeed not serve us so well.We always need to question and look outside the box.One path may serve us really well, but then up to a point we need the courage to become a little more self-sufficent and independent.But of course that is only possible if you already tried anumber of techniques.One path is proven method that those that espouse it often say works for most people.This is often true but i think yoga is like awell-tailored jacket and chances are it won’t always fit everyone perfectly or indeed the same person it does fit next year or in 10 years time.

I think sampling is fine.

The question you should ask yourself is:-

[U]Am I using effective or proven techniques that work , or are working for YOU, when combined with a regular practice done over time?[/U]

That is the main question ,perhaps indeed the only one you need.

I use to follow a school called AYP, i.e strictly,to the letter, which i continue to gain a great deal of guidance and inspiration from. It would’nt be accurate to say on follow it in it’s entirety any more.I foolow the Bihar school/satyanada yoga but to be fair i think i would probably be totaly lost and bit overwhlemed had i not had a solid foundation at AYP( see http://www.aypsite.org)I would’nt have the confidence or knowledge that what i’d do practice miight work. The AYPA apporach made me self-sufficent and taught me to question and helped me understand the mechanisms with it’s scientific & open-source approach.

Some times there are not contradictions between schools. I follow the chakra purification programme outlined n Satyananda’s book ‘Kundalini Tantra’ but i would be out my depth had i not followed AYP method. I also am also fond of the AYP deep meditation method.The bihar encourages a meditation technique but does’nt prescribe anything.I think if you understand the mechanisms ,and have experienced them in action,then you can use techniques to complement one another.Say kriya yoga with meditation technique.Though i think kundalini kriya yoga of the bihar school may well be a powerful sadhan on it’s own. Howver i do have a soft spot for AYP deep meditationand believe it is very powerful and effective for bringing the mind and indeed transcending it rapidly to stillness and cultivating inner silence , the thoughtless state ,the witness.

The main obvious pitfall with any path is if there is mappears to be a lack of information on the mechanism behind kundalini or how to balance the energy body.Some knowledge of the science behind it and how to avoid the occassional mishaps means we open up ina smooth ,comfortable manner over the long-term.

I see all these techniques as strings to your bow. But you’re only going to have the confidence to use them based on past experience of what works and what works but perhaps less so.I think you can use some as adjuncts.

I don’t seee how it can that diffcult if you have sufficent understanding on paper and based on experience.I am heavily infcluenced by AYP but iwould’nt say i am strict devotee or that i necessarily agree with everything that is written.Each apporach has it’s own merits and weaknesses for soome people. And the only way of working those out iis sustained practice through experience.Gurus or sytems won’t take you there but the eoffrts and steady application of the practitoner.

Alot of folk probably remain stuck in a system for years because the support-base and/or encouragement of another is absent.We need to find the courage to look beond thee confines of any box we think we could be stuck in.If we have access to a proven path, indeed any path then we are luckier than most.All paths have something to teach and it’s good if we remain open to this fact,idea.Also everyone’s individual journey is unique.How we arrive does’nt really matter. That we’ve arrived, or found a satisfactory home (or that we can rest our weary head in perhaps), is good enough.

The issue with most yoga in the west seems to me that it idoes’nt apply a full-scope model in it’s apporach. The thing here is you only develop an appreciation of full-scope over time where you have a suitable balance of a number of the limbs and components in a balanced but highly effective practice,pranayam,meditation, yoga asana,mudras & bhandas,diet &lifestyle. .Some ofthe techniques may be too powerful used in beginner’s hands.Some times that ihowvere is what a beginner ends up learning.A beginner should’nt have to learn the hard way though it’s not a bad way.

The lack of a full scope model is fine,nothing wrong with that, say just practicing asanas but it probably mean a much less effective yoga.Depnds wht you’re after, what it is you might be lookng for.One proven path is fine. But not to get overly attached to or stuck on that path, have the courage to look outisde it or at other paths is likely even better especially if that path is not working as best as it could be, for you. The main ingredient here is always bhakti, spiritual desire;with sufficent bhakti all paths will take you home.The routes may just differ just slightly or indeed a lot amongst different practitioners, seekers.Enjoying the journey whatever happens or does’nt is a good tip.

Alot of the time there are no or little contradictions between different schools.We may see contradiction if we want to see that.

Thank you InnerAthlete and Core789, that was wonderful advice.

Core789, I definitely agree with about Bihar school of Yoga. I have practiced Satyananda Yoga and have tried various techniques like ajapa and japa yoga, chidakasha dharana, yoga nidra, antar mouna. The techniques Swami Satyanada gives in “Sure ways to self realization” have proven to be very powerful indeed and I have found I can construct an entire meditation program by simply taking those techniques from the book. I do the pre-meditation techniques like awareness and introspection, then I do the concentration exercises like chidakasha dharana at other times to refine my concentration and visualization skills, and for meditation I am sticking to antar mouna because I realise that without pratyhara there is no point starting dharana(meditation proper) It was thanks to Swami Satyananda that I realised that I had not been meditating all those years before, and I had only achieived pratyhara two or three times. I think this is what most people do not realise and they go on meditating for years on end(decades) getting nowhere.

Now here is my dilemma I have not gone properly gone through the prelimary stage of asana and pranayama(kriya/kundalini yoga basicaly) I have always been somewhat reluctant to do it and wheenver I start, I do not remain commited. I do have some natural flexibility though and can assume full lotus.(past life work perhaps) I have more of a raja and jnana yogi and my natural inclination is towards meditation. However, I am starting to think now perhaps I should put raja yoga on hold and commit myself single mindedly to kriya yoga or hatha yoga. I think once I have reached an advanced stage in this, raja yoga will become more easier and I will be able to achieive pratyhara more frequently. So would you recommend this, or should I continue with my Bihar school raja yoga program and simply add elements of kriya/kundalini yoga on the side.

Surya deva,

I think the effectiveness of any given approach may have some relationship with the unique matrix of obstructions within any given individual.Energetically,physiologically,emotionally,mentally etc.

ajapa and japa yoga
I’m not totally conversant with all possible subtle distinctions between the two.Generally ,Ajapa is spontanous whereas japa is based repetition.I will say that rote mechanical repetition is less effective than repitition where you neither chase the mantra nor hold or hang on it. This i am led to believe is much more effective in working on superficial mind and rapidly transcending it all the way to stillness,inner silence or PBC.AYP deep meditation i can tell you uses this approach.It’s basically the same as Transcendental Meditation but uses a universal mantra based on it’s sound properties.

I can talk about Deep Meditation as that is the technique i am very familar with and have experience with.Indeed it’s possible it may well be like the Rolls Royce or Cadillac of meditation techniques.Unlike some forms of japa yoga it does’nt use a mala for a start; not all do.Repeition of " I am" is all that is entailed.Also some forms of japa may say we do not lose mantra. In AYP actually losing the mantra is a very good sign indeed. It has deomonstarted that a lot of deep cleansing has taken place in the deep realms of sub-conscious/unconsious.It’s typically characterised by wondering what one is indeed doing at some point during our sitting…We completely ose ourselves for a moment as it were, until we realise that has occured , come to,and then go back to the simple procedure, i.e mental recitation of mantra.Also i’ve just looked ‘Meditation from the Tantras’ book which is indeed an eye-opener and somewhat encyclopoaedic;Satyananda/that book obviously bears the legacy of Swami Sivananda(see here on an excerpt from his Japa Yoga)Also whereas in that book i consulted said you can observe other thoughts from the ‘witness state’ as it were while focused on the mantra , i.e if & while they arise the AYP approach it is said to ‘favour’ the mantra.Indeed that seems to be their key-word. So it is expected that thoughts indeed will arise and so achnowledged as a positive and natural thing. This is purification and cleansing occuring.Sometimes it seems the ayp mantra method can become like ajapa, i.e spontaneous. Indeed in that book under the ‘ajapa yoga’ chapter it say japa becomes ajapa after a while and then it is true meditation or some such thing.I can tell you that AYP deep meditation traverses very effectively all the limbs from, yes, pratyahara all the way to samadhi and at times can seem to oscillate between limbs depending on how the purification is going at any given point or indeed session.It goes deep quickly and from the start;that is why it is effective and potent and a standard 20 mins is prescribed.Japa or mantra yoga which may be a bigger umbrella(–i’m not technically up on all the distinctions), can take you all the way home,enlightenment,self-realization liberation,God-head etc on it’s own but i think it’s real power and potency can be employed when combining with other yogas or techniques.

Yes, Yes, Yes—Pratyahara is like the Gateway limb to the “higher yogas”.I can tell you that Deep Meditaition will facilitate introversion of the senses;this in turn makes our practices much more effective as we are much less, perhaps even not at all, distracted by the external distractions of our enviroment.We can go deep much more easily.Pratayhara also facilitates a relaxed awareness which is also very essential to going deep and for making our meditations effective. That is why hatha yoga is prescribed becuase it deals with the bodily tensions and seeks to unite & harmonise body-mind.Relaxation on all levels [I]can[/I] be somewhat more difficult.

I can tell you that the AYP apporach works through a kind of [B][I]reverse-engineering[/I][/B]. The DM serves first to loosen the nerves. But overall that apporach is best,including DM, on global purification.It relies alot on spiritual surrender,i.e letting go componont of DM, and they are also quite fanatical or religious about their bhakti, which is good thing.Meditation components do tend todo this’ they can kind of turbo-charge your spiritual growth, a bit like catalytic injection and useful in cultivating the witness state, deep & abiding inner silence ayp call it…

Now the question you posited i asked what sounds like pretty much the same thing. Is hatha yoga and puirfication of the body and balancing of the energetic system worth following? I can tell you that in the AYP system it is not long before it is tken up but DM isprecribed first and does indeed serve to loosen the nerves , psychically as well as indeed physically too( believe it or not).

Some schools may well suggest that you wait until kundalin is sufficiently awake until you embrace something like meditation(proper). Indeed i think some possibly do say this- see Here for example. But there is no right way just different approaches, with the scale of safety perhaps variable…Some wil say balance ida & pingala as a pre-requisite for suhshumna awakening as a pre-cursor before K awakening & crown fruition/maturation…The bihar prepartion uses a tantric sadhana, a mixed-component sadhana, that large employs kumbhaka, chakra location and tuning and then togther with mudras & bhandas to open up each chakra, done in sequence…Generally the ajna is opened first as master controller and then the root which grounds us and adresses twin sides of the polar charge.

Pratyahara is a useful benefit of effective meditation techniques and could be in degrees. You say you rarely acheived ‘true P’.Dm method acheives this and the other limbs.

I don’ think there a right or wrong answer. But embracing more of the limbs will make your yoga more effective.All that is needded then is the discipline & commitment to regular practice.

One could come to a point as a raja or meditation practioner that you become more sensitive to the practice.Some times it can be a symptom of not being sufficiently relaxed, i’e able to let-go… that is completely, mind& body…

You might just have an asana programme that is neither workiing or not serving you best. So you may wish to review that.I would recommend Satyananda seminal book for that ‘Asana,Pranayam,Mudra & Bhanda’ as well as ‘Kundalini Tantra’, another invaluable & obvious jewel in the yoga literature. The Bihar & AYP both lay out a path that is doable for most folk.

I would combine them all along with self-pacing principle and monitoring any sensitivities that may or may not crop up with any given technique. Deep mantra meditation, if there are existing imbaalnces could not always serve you best.The AYP practices are global purifiers but i think you can always use and test to see how sensitive you are.I think some of the base-line AYP practices can be employed to see how senstive you mgiht be or how much prufication has taken place.

I would say stick with one path. That is what i am doing. I am using the tantric sadhana of ‘Kundalini Tantra’ and emplying DM as a global purifer, mind transcender, PBC cultivator currently now and again, ie. as long as i am not too sensitive to it…I don’t practice it all the time but i have used AYP for testing purification levels and sampling to be honest with you.No delyaed effects or anything like this.All seem fairly effective. I’m sure meditation is probably easier when K is fully awake.But i don’t think there is necessarily a right or wrong answer.I think you could be senstive to any of the limbs. A bit like alchemical cookery ,The trick is putting toegther a recipe that works & is currently working. If you are sensitive to something like DM you could always employ the sadhan of Kundalini Tantra and that leave that to later.There only one way of knowing, through sutained practice, of course.

As i say ayp works from the inside -----> moving outwards.It goes deeep right from the start, then tries to balnce out the energy body, which it does. It’s just that some of us may benefit from other tool-suites in order to get the job done. Although the job as such and our own Consciousness evolution never stops. Things are always changing or in transtion.

If you’ve experienced the sublte body or pranamaya kosha ,which influences the physical and the mental, the bridge between the two. and know what to look for in terms of experience, in terms of activity in your third-eye, the crown and when nadis have been freed up and cleared, then i think you’re making good porgress. The rest is just a matter of time and being able to cultivate an accepatnce of where you are at and be able to live in the present…

Also just do your practice without expectation of results.Just do it.

I think I read Muz Murray, a mantra master for about 35 years since the 60’s say something like.

Whatever happens happens. Whatever does’nt does’nt. Those that accept or accepting of this are firmly established in the spiritual self.

So take the attitude that ita does’nt really matter what happens. As long as we obserne some of the first principles and techniques as they relate to safety and the over-arching prinicple of AYP, they call it self-pacing.We can’t go too slow but we can charge head too fast.So we just pace our openings for a safe and comfortable journey.

I hope this response of mine makes some sense. You asked a question i did indeed query myself.Combing all the limbs tends to deliver the best results.What you should do is guage how the different techniques affect you and complement you on all levels and then formulate something accordingly.

chidakasa dharana
By the way this probably helps to open the third eye and our sense of inner space.

yoga nidra
Is good if you’re really stuck or stressed and no. of applications, depression,sever imbalance etcetera

antar mouna
Well i believe this cultivates inner silnece and can be done during daily living.It resonated with me because of my experience with Deep Meditation.Possibly slightly different but certainly similar and gets to the heart of yoga, yes.

I have’nt really explored all the techniques in that book. I do do ajapa japa as part of the tantric programme for opening the heart chakra.

The thing with those Bihar books they are literally packed full of hundreds of techniques so they cater for everyone. That is their strength and they cover most of the main yogas. So not one person is left out.

As i say i probably would’nt know what i was doing or have the inclination or belief to follow via some of those manuals had i not gained a very solid and very good foundation in the form of AYP, the online written lessons i read (& continue to read) and experience i gained there, in first principles and techniques etc…They encourage the cultivation of the inner guru(DM does appear to do this, assuming you’re not overly sensitive to the practice, that is;senstivites may be the result of general imbalance) which i believe points the way towards self-sufficiency and independence.I love AYP’s scientific(Aas well as logical ,simple and rational;it’s non-sectarian for one) approach;it is based on documented data and informed also by current modern scientific understanding and also therefore transparent,open-sourced. It has helped me immeasurably navigate the diverse and rich spiritual field out there.A great deal of their theory informs my approach, my understanding. I can see immediately how this can all seem pretty bewildering to someone just starting out, indeed anywhere.

Trying out different systems is good idea , as long as the job gets done.And we can settle on a path that is working for us.

Thank you once again Core, for your very wonderful advice, detailed analysis and sharing your meditation techniques with me. The deep meditation technique sounds very interesting, but it sounds very similar to other japa yoga practices. I don’t know why but I seem to have an aversion to mantra yoga. I naturally gravitate towards breathing meditation and silent meditation, which is probably why I naturally do antar mouna. I may have been a Raja yogi in my past life. I will defintely give DM a try though. Anything that can take me to pratyhara is very welcome.

The genuine pratyhara experiences I have had are unmistakable. The most powerful one happend when I was trying a visualization of falling and then I lost complete sensory awareness and experienced proper introversion. It was like being submerged under water. It also has taken place in meditation and sometimes it is accompanied by a feeling of moving ahead.

I have had some nice beginner gains when I started some practice 10 years ago. I had a few out of body experieces which lasted only seconds. Recently, I have even had the siddhis of clairvoyance and telepathy awaken, but again it lasted only seconds. Yesterday, I experienced this again and my astral sight awakened and I was propelled outside of my body, it continued for a few minutes, but then I lost it. I think of all this maybe suggesting I can get to very high states of pratyhara and some level of dharana with samayama, but I think so far they have all been flukes. I find it hard to control. They also seem to take place much more easily just after waking or when I am very tired.

The one thing I have noted in my meditation practice is that my breath most of the time is irregular and I get pain in my ankles after about 20-30 min. This is why I was thinking I may need to do hatha/kriya/kundalini yoga to get some level of prana purifiying to facilitate my raja yoga practice. Oh, and if you can recommend something for those damn ankles!

I normally begin my meditation with reciting the gayatri mantra 3 times, then a non-fixed amount of om japa. Then I do 3 kinds of pranayama in the following order(ujjayi, nadi shodana, Kapalabhati) This lasts up to 15-20 min. Then with the mind more calmer I begin antar mounaw which lasts 30-40 min (at which point my ankles are paining) I have constructed this routine by combining various sources. My focus is always on the third eye centre.

I recently downloaded the Kriya yoga techniques by sombody who has revealed them online. I really feel now I should stick to a path and I am being pulled by Kriya Yoga, the so-called fast path to evolution. I will go to India soon in order to find a path which will accept me up to 2 years so I can do intense sadhana under the guidance of the guru and tradition. I have considered several paths Bihar school of Yoga, kriya yoga and Vedanta by Swami Chinmayananda mission which offer a 3 year gurukul training. Do you have any recommendations ?

[QUOTE=Surya Deva;32222]Do you think it is advisable to mix paths and techniques in ones spiritual journey by mixing and matching? In the traditional spiritual culture one woud commit to one path and practice whatever was prescribed and do nothing else. In the modern age, where we are exposed to every other path, we learn about other ways and techniques.

In my spiritual practice I try out various kind of meditations from various traditons. Sometimes I do moving meditations. I do self-analysis, candle gazing, japa and ajapa meditation, all kinds of pranayama, concentration exercises, Yoga Nidra, astral projection, visualizations and introspection. I have constructed this routine from mixing and matching from various traditions I learned from.

Do you think it is better to just stick to one path and the techniques it prescribes?[/QUOTE]

Keep it simple, but study up, and practice up. Most of it is the same things said in different languages.

Taoist yoga is indian yoga. Tibetian yoga is indian yoga. All religion is basically a yogic treatise. All same. All paths lead to the same place. Lots of techniques. Different points of emphasis. Differnt objectives and side quests. Sounds like you need a system - bihar is supposedly respected. I dunno. Lots of charlatans out there who don’t know what they don’t know. It’s tough. Why are you doing the practices your doing?

Hi Surya Deva,

It is tough.

I follow Bihar. I used to follow AYP (aypsite.org)

Bihar programmes are as good as any.I currently use the hatha & laya techniques mainly past six months.Two of the most potent & powerful yogas , i have heard ,out there.Tantra yoga , you might say, basically, mixed-bag…Ocassionaly use ayp deep mantra meditation if i think it is sensible.

It gets significantly eaiser as your knowledge,experience and confidence accumulate.Gettting in two sesssion at least some days will improve results.You can separate the sesssions so if you are still a little agitated at the end of hatha session and overrun clock say then stop and do a more subtle meditation sesssion during another sesssion.Practice without care for results. Make inner & outer observations, and so on.

Combining all the techniques and yogas brings the fastest results and is most potent. Your knowledge,experience and confidence accumulate and it gets significantly easier &more comfortable.Reading on different perspectives and experiences ,the lkes of online i havefound useful.Patience etc…

I suspect you know all this.

Mantra,kriya,hatha,raja,laya,bhakti,karma,jnana etcetera

They are all up for grabs & definitely for the taking.

Self-pace would be my final bit of advice.

I could’nt comment on that last one you mentioned.You sound pretty well-informed and seem to have alot of valuable experiences and knowledge.There is maybe longer learning curve without a teacher but it prmotes self-reliance and cultivating one’s own inner guru.Teachers are only supplmentary and point to the inner guru.

I had a rocky start a bit like gopi krishna except worse but itseems to me ironing itself out. In fact i made categorical error; and it was this no knowledge of self-pacing using powerful techniques over too short a time-scale. A full scope sahdna is actually safer as well as faster armed with basic knowledge & regular practice…

I find i get (some)pratyahara, introversion of the senses, with subtle sambhavi mudra.

I find just focusing on the thrid-eye brings about a certain amount of pratyahara.If you’ve felt the pranic currents during meditational still practices, then i think you’re making good progress and on track.

There are joint loosening or rather energy freeing exercises for the joints in the bihar books that will help with your ankles.Some are called pre-meditation asanaa and will give you a steady & firm seat to sit for meditations, whatever they may be.Gradually introduce shatkarmas and other asanas.

I trried some of those practices iin Meditations on the Tantras book.Theere were quite a few. I used the mantra from AYP.lLike i said and you said elswhere some schools don’t presccribe true meditation until after you wake up Kundalini.

These are just my own evaulations. I am no expert.

It can be tricky and takes alot of patience but by no means at al it is it impossible or unrealistic. All it requires is dedication and a long-haul perspective.

btw- my understanding of pratyahara is one introverts one’s awareness(i.e sensory) away from external objects, ie the external world. One’s meditations would obviously e deeper.I am pretty sure i experienced this during as i say deep mantra meditation.One goes inward much easier because one kind of blanks out everything else going on around us so therfore one is not distracted at all.With this particular technique you are in parts doing housecleaning on deep layers of the unconscious and barely conscious. You transcend mind. I think you seem to have a good grasp of all of this.With this particular technique you will lose the mantra. I’m not sure if japa/ajapa yogas are all like that.When i think about sometimes DM sems to be like a bit of both,i.e it straddles both. As some folk listen to the mantra after it’s baked in during and say according to different phases of purification so they are not controlling and unconsciously influencing it too much. I know that a letting-go attitude is so useful in all that practices. It is integral to the observer state and can faciliate more rapid spiritual transformations based on readings and experiences.

Hi, let me share a point of view that might be interesting, it`s from my psychologist :slight_smile: - who also practices yoga for couple of years, and meditation for some more, and as such has quite unique opinion.

He told me that he often recommends yoga to other psychologist, as they seem to deal mostly with mind, and negate body.

He also recommends psychology for yoga teachers, as they seem to be negating importance of mind sometimes, and be unknowingly be rulled by some deep, undealt subconcious things, even after decades of yoga practice.

He believs that a + b (perhaps + c, being for instance meditation) will give you more than just a, or b, or will require less time. But only if it wont be a+ b + c + d… all the way to z, and you will eventualy not do enything good.

Right now I have in my life couple of letters, and I do feel its a bit confusing at times, I have too much. But I can not simply and quickly decide whats right and wrong as my patch, I need some time, some mistakes, some experimentations, and experiences to choose what works. I might choose wrong, too, but I also believe choosing wrong is only part of a bigger, right patch anyway, so it`s fine too.

I just believe that in determining one paths, or mixing some together, there are no “shoulds” and “musts”.