yes, i see the nod to the other discussion thread. thank you for bring that back into the conversation.
for me, these threads vary greatly. in my thinking, this current thread is a great discussion thread for the following reasons:
• scott is not the one bringing the lawsuit • he is asking for discussion here and began the conversation with his own thoughts • his language is thoughtful and non-condemning, [I]“If these [U]accusations[/U] are true…” [/I]• he quotes his source that he is referencing as CNN and again is careful to list accusations as exactly that, accusations. • both sides are represented in the system and press • both are making statements
are you really glad to hear that i think it’s different? i don’t mean to question the genuineness of your statement, but i am feeling out of touch with you.
it is seems to me, that since my return, my lean on moderation has not been totally inline with what you and alix seem to both be in agreement on. i feel ok with this, like there will likely be some flux here on occasion even though for the 3 of us it has been rare imo. Is it feeling differently for you? besides my sincere gratitude for them, your toes are very precious to me! i don’t want step on them. i don’t mean to appear to be directive toward you or alix in your carrying out of things, i am simply offering my thoughts and perspective on the topics at hand. i know before, with david’s take over of the forum, there was some confusion and what a moderator was supposed to do after he said that he disagreed with an action. to be clear for me, 9 times of 10, i am ok with either of you going ahead as you were, but 10 of 10 times, i would like to share my thought on it too.
are we cool? is there more that we should have out between us?