When we Pranayam at that time kundalini will arise from his base and start to move in the body so is it called a natural shaktipat ?
and
when we arise kundalini by this way and under no guidence then are we able to control the flow of kundalini Energy ?
Are these questions or statements?
The second segment I almost comprehend but it is depedndant on the first which I do not understand at all.
Who is we?
Which pranayam technique?
Are you referring to the energetic kundalini (within) or the practice of yoga using the same name?
What is your definition of shaktipat?
Dear innerathlete
first of all sorry that i had made a mistake in writing of english.
all of the above are the questions ??? which many students come to me and talk about this.
in first question I had asked that when anyone will do pranayam practices and at that time if kundalini will awake then is it called shaktipat ?
here we means we all not you not me and not others that all combine then that is we.
mine defination of shaktipat is that A Flow of energy comes from anywhere to help us in the spiritual practices, it may be from a Enlighted guru or a any yoga excercise or from anywhere. which ultimately help us in our pinacle.
i am talking about any pranayam techniqe.
i am reffering the energetic kundalini.
No apologies needed.
Nothing to be “sorry” about.
The board is global and it is kind of those from other countries to write in English.
The nature of kundalini, and its questions are, in my mind, best left to very experienced, senior teachers. I believe kundalini energy to be very powerful and like all powerful tools it is not to be triffled with. I have not raised kundalini in my pranayama practice and I’m uncertain as to whether pranayama is utilized to do such a thing (raise Kundalini). I do not do it for such a purpose. If it is not the purpose of pranayama to raise kundalini and during pranayama kundalini rises it may be shaktipat (as you’ve defined it) or it may be “accidental” (as much as any yogi even believes in accidental).
Different pranayam techniques have different purposes otherwise there would just be one. But I am not really keen on pranayama where anyone who wanders into the ashram sits down to raise kundalini through it. I find it to be unethical to teach beginners how to do such things as they do not have a foundation for the work and it can therefore have very serious repercussions.
If I am approached by students inquiring about Kundalini energy then I want to know the nature of their inquiry. Why are they asking about such things and with what purpose? Further, I would advise my students not to venture into concern over kundalini until they’ve got a very solid foundation of yoga asana practice with proper alignment of the physical body.
Others who may teach differently in the realms of prana and kundalini, I would imagine, advise their students according to their teaching.
From the very pages found in siddhyogi’s signature, I learnt that shakptipat is when a spiritual master (guru) directly intervenes in the disciple’s causal body, awakens kundalini and directs it’s ascension in sushumna nadi.
I would not call the awakening and ascension of kundalini caused by “accidents” or by the disciples own effort, I would not call these natural shaktipat. Probably the etimology of the word shaktipat might make this more obvious, but I am not venturing into that. (because I have not the slightest idea what that would be)