Realizing Awareness through Self Integration

Dear all,

I just finished writing an article about an important aspect of our Self Realization process. I belief that, if properly understood, this key-understanding/practice will help you to make quantum-leaps immediately. That’s what it is doing for me. It is a blessing and I cannot belief, now that these insights have dawned on me, that I have never heard someone teach unity like this before. This understanding, to me, works wonders. I hope it will do the same for you!

I belief it is this site’s policy not to post articles that have been posted elsewhere already. So I cannot post it here. But I do wish for those who are interested in experiencing immediate peace and unity, integration, to have a chance of reading it.

[I]To the moderators: If this is considered advertisement by your rules, feel free to move the topic or delete it entirely.[/I]

Here is the article I wrote. Feel free to question and comment on it either here, or below the article itself.

A Way of Awareness - Self Integration

With Loving Awareness,
Bentinho.

I’m afraid this is beyond my comprehension. But I am exhausted by my studies. Perhaps another day I’ll have the time and mental stamina to really give it the proper attention.

[B]Observation >> Condemnation >> Modification, or Change[/B].

[B][I][COLOR=black][FONT=Arial][B][I]I’d substitute Condemnation with Asessment of Error. Otherwise, having this reasoning, we unconsciously condemn the above process as one awakening the feeling of quilt, and because we unconsciously abhorr this feeling, we want to find this reasoning to be futile, pointless. Thus, we prove the futility of this process by appealing to the unconscious fear of the reader and the desire to escape from it. But those who are not afraid to burden their souls with the feeling of quilt, asess this trap and can avoid it. (indeed, in the original text, the author uses the picture" one being one’s own judge and executioner" ; apparently, a more tolerant, loving, accepting attitude towards himself is out of his view )[/I][/B][/FONT][/I][/COLOR][/B]

[I][B][I][COLOR=black][FONT=Arial][B]Asessment of error does not automatically equal condemnation, and when it does, it shows the ambition of one to become ever more perfect. This can be perceived as an attachment to the idea of perfection, or freedom. Noone can escape this, who strives for truth, but we must face that this is selfish, what is another word for egoism, and balance it giving the right reason for it’s existence, what is, to do it for the sake of the world, and other people. Than it is only a short term egoism, selfishness, an acknowledged, assumed quality, what we perform for the greater good. Freedom alone is selfishness if it is not to provide for other people’s freedom. Indeed the best way to break an attachment is to transform it to a duty. :)[/B][/FONT][/I][/COLOR][/B][/I]

[I][B][I][COLOR=black][FONT=Arial][B]From the ambition, striving for freedom, perfection, borns the inability to accept one’s error, one’s desire to correct one’s errors as soon as possible. This is due to the lack of strenght to bear the burden of error, it is the inpatience of the suffering man, whose only desire is to end his pain. But if one develops the soul strenght to face his suffering caused by one’s errors, than one can free himself from those errors calmly, by accepting the fact that one carries a weakness what made them possible, and by taking the resolve, that one will work to develop this weak area of one’s being. Not running at the first sign of our irrational fear to face our quilt, but letting it spread upon us, we will experience the shame, and the resulting suffering, consciously. (Remember, the ego, the little self is the one who feels pain in one’s errors, because it cannot accept itself as an imperfect being.) Than, we will remember this error well, and through this process, we free ourself from it. Next time when we might fall to it, we remember how painful it is to bear it’s consuequences in our soul and through our natural rejection of painful expereinces, we will avoid it. This is a natural process of learning. When, in time, this becomes a habit, than one will always do what is right, as a habit, and only than the freedom of consciousness, freedom of awareness is granted to higher purposes.[/B][/FONT][/I][/COLOR][/B][/I]
[I][B][I][COLOR=black][FONT=Arial][B]Suffering can only be avoided by knowing it. To know suffering, one has to suffer.[/B][/FONT][/I][/COLOR][/B][/I]

[I][B][I][COLOR=black][FONT=Arial][B]Condemnation denotes that we do something what we cannot accept with a clear conscience. Do we accept the reality of conscience ? For me, the quoted reasoning proves that the one who performs it, has a conscience, a very strong one. The existence of a higher moral judge in us what signals immediatly when we perform actions what contradict it’s nature, seems obvious. I am sure that for many practitioners, the voice of their conscience is the voice of the higher Self, the universal Self, Cosmic Ego, Christ being.[/B][/FONT][/I][/COLOR][/B][/I]

[B][I]The process could also be:[/I][/B]

[B][I]Observation[/I][/B]
[B][I]Asessment of Error[/I][/B]
[B][I]Patience, deepening our awarness of the nature of error and it’s relation to us (cause, susceptibility) [/I][/B]
[B][I]Observation of what it awakes in the soul, what feeling and corresponding will impulses[/I][/B]
[B][I]Bringing these feelings and will impulses into the center of our awarness (the realm of thought)[/I][/B]
[B][I]Realizing the means to avoid the error or to live with this susceptibility (finding ways to implement it’s treatement or inclusion in our habitual patterns)[/I][/B]

[B][I]Surely, it all depends on the nature of the error, but it is important to realize that we have a clear consciounsess only in the realm of our thinking, thus awarness is used to catch feelings and will impulses what are usually semi-conscious, or subconscious, than bringing them to our field, where we can work with them, into the realm of thought.[/I][/B]
[B][I]There are other ways to know, and realize, but we must start somewhere. Until we are able of genuine imagination, inspiration and intuition, our best tool is a clear, objective thinking separated from feeling and will impulses.[/I][/B]

[QUOTE=Hubert;18168]

[I][B][I][COLOR=black][FONT=Arial][B]Suffering can only be avoided by knowing it. To know suffering, one has to suffer.[/B][/FONT][/I][/COLOR][/B][/I]
[/QUOTE]

Suffering & happiness depends on our past karmas, so even if you want you can’t avoid either of them or you may suffer or you may not.

Moreover we can learn from other’s experiences what a suffering is like, also there are other ways to learn what can cause future sufferings. There are so many books, scriptures, teachings available today. I don’t think one has to suffer to know about suffering.

Everyone born to this world has to suffer, no exceptions. Only that some do not realize it, they still live in the protective walls of their castles like the young Siddharta.

The four noble truths, what are they ?
But where we have a choice, is what we make of our sufferings, how we relate to our painful experiences.

Do I like to suffer ? Rest assured I do not.
Am I grateful for what I have learnt from my sufferings ? Absolutley.
In our weakness the greatest strenght is hidden.

Empathy is not possible without letting other beings suffering in.

Dear Hubert,

Thank you for taking the time to respond. However, I wish to be completely honest with you, therefore:

I did not feel any connection in your post, from you to what I meant with my article. Correct me if I am wrong, but you missed the true meaning of the article, or you did not feel like committing yourself to reading it openly, honestly trying to understand it in your own, direct experience.

All I get from you is an intellectual response, it seems to me. Which is nice to start a new debate, but nothing more. Off-topic almost. It sounds like you were more focused at finding possible flaws in the use of words so you could unleash your own intellect against it, than that you were actually listening to what I was saying and aiming for. For me, you have missed the purpose of the article entirely, but again, please do correct me if I am wrong. I simply state what I perceive and sense based on your response.

[B][I]

[B][I][FONT=Arial][SIZE=3](indeed, in the original text, the author uses the picture" one being one’s own judge and executioner" ; apparently, a more tolerant, loving, accepting attitude towards himself is out of his view )[/I][/B]
[/SIZE][/FONT][/I][/B]

Hubert, my entire article is about establishing immediate acceptance and love and compassion for oneself. Obviously you haven’t [I]truly[/I] read the article, or simply weren’t really open at the time of reading it. I know you can be though… What’s up?

Also, I find this statement of yours - among some other pieces - a bit suggesting, as if you know exactly how I see life and can state it as a fact towards everybody here. Let me assure you that as long as you are so quick to jump to conclusions as you are now, and so quick to seek the security of intellectual (which is Past) interpretation of what you are perceiving (Now), you will have no clue what I see before and while writing an article or choosing my words.

I suggest you to read the article again and try it humbly, authentically for yourself, if you wish. Maybe this time you’ll catch the intimacy of the practice with yourself and the love that I try to bring about for your own immediate benefit and realization, and thus to that of the world. Maybe not.

[I]Love & Light,[/I]

Bentinho

My response is not to the full article, indeed. It is only analyzis and meditation of the quoted part. Thus, I ask you to excuse me, because I did not express this fact.

I still haven’t to read the full article. If, after I read I’ll find that it proves my points to be moot (from your reaction I think there is quite a chance for it to happen) than I’ll ask a moderator to delete my former posts, and I’ll create a new answer.

Apologizes, again. It was very unprofessional to adress only a part of your work, done more because I did lack the time to fully read your reasonings, than from malicious intent.

If we are at apologizes, I also apologize to PatR, my reasoning on suffering might have sounded like I am advocating wishing for suffering. I am not, and I value her and other people’s feedback greatly. I wish people would argue more, because through their reactions I often realize my mistakes.

Hey Hubert

Apologies accepted. Looking forward to hearing what the article did to/for you once you have read it entirely and understood it, hopefully.

Thanks for your honesty and for not denying. Not that I expected that from you, but still I applaud your honesty.

Love & Awareness,
Bentinho

Please suffer the lack of my answer a bit longer. I have been distracted a bit … or should I say, I wanted to much, too soon ? :slight_smile:

Anyway, I will pay my debt to you, dear brother.

Love & Freedom my friend, all is fine. Thank you for your attention in this matter.

Just read that thread for yourself whenever you feel ready and up for it. Any sooner, or doing it for me, will not have maximum effect.

Love,
B.