[QUOTE=Swaybe;56957]I don’t buy the ‘evolved to eat meat’ idea. I don’t think a human could go out into the wild and take down a deer for dinner, and then proceed to eat it raw, like animals that are actually carnivorous do.
Meat is not the only means of getting protein. In fact, I’ve read several times that your average North American gets double the amount of protein they actually need. And you don’t need to rely on soy or fake meat products![/QUOTE]
No, we ‘have evolved to eat meat’ is a scientifically established fact. If not buying it, I suggest you read, for example, Peter H. Kahn’s new book “Technological Nature.” No American bias, no superego bullshit. He draws on the adaptation of hunter-gatherer African Bushmen, quite objectively. And exemplifies how these people eat meat on certain times of the year, not all the time, due to their understanding of natural-animal systems.
Meat is not the only way, but it is the best way to get high quality protein and enzimes. Yet, like in anything else, overdoing something will have drawbacks. In this case, overeating meat (especially red meat), has dire health consequences. Nonetheless, we need meat.
We could go out into the wild, stalk an animal for days, and then righteously hunt it, if we have the skills. I am against meat-houses, where you don’t even give a chance chance to animal to defend itself, but butcher it in machines. This is the food ethic I support: life is valuable, so if your body needs meat, you gotta show that you have got the skills to claim your meat. Hunter-gatherer way!
Even lots of people who claim to be vegetarian crave for a tiny bit of meat (chicken if not beef; fish if not chicken; prawns if not fish), although their psychological self-restraint mechanism could be quite rooted.