[QUOTE=oak333;39580]Here it is the official opinion of the Catholic church about yoga:
http://www.ourladyswarriors.org/dissent/yoga.htm
This is an official site. It has writings by Pope John Paul II, Cardinal Ratzinger
(the present Pope) and the Congreggation for the Doctrine of Faith, the dogma watcher.
I would rather be careful about the dangers of yoga, as actually specified by the advanced yogis and mentioned in the text above. A real guru is of
inestimable value, but really how many real gurus are there ?[/QUOTE]
Read the info on the link. I was especially interested to see Reiki mentioned. Much, if not all of the info is incorrect. There are a group of people who believe the origins of Reiki lies in Escoteric Buddhism. But this belief is not commonly held and I find it interesting that while the majority of people disregard this, it is listed as an argument against Reiki practice. in looking at the Distant Reiki symbol, it is Kanji, originally a Chinese idiogram, and not a Tibetan character.
As many of you already know, I am a level II Reiki practitioner. One of the most blatant errors in the article is the statement about the Reiki practitioner being the healer. We are not the healer, but the conduit. There is a big difference here. I was taught Reiki by a Sisters of Charity Nun. She taught us the original Usui method of Reiki and we studied at great length the history and common misconceptions. Usui was a Buddhist Monk who was in search of a healing method that did not deplete ones own energy. He studied Kiko, Japanese version of QiGong. He thought the practice was wonderfully healing, but were prone to energy depletion. He traveled throughout the world studying and searching for a method of healing that would not deplete ones energy. He was at a retreat, and toward the very end a great and powerful spiritual light entered his head and he had a satori. The Reiki energy came to him, that very moment in the form of attunement. He began Reiki healing first on himself and then his family. During an earthquake in the early 1920’s in Japan he and his students used Reiki to help those who were injured. Reiki came to the West through a woman named Takata who lived in Hawaii.
Anyway, suffice to say, Reiki is not Wiccan, nor is it some release of sexual energy, nor is it that you are the healer.
And as far as the info on yoga. All I can say (and I will include the part about Reiki) is that which we don’t understand we condemn. I believe it is so unfortunate, if it is true, that the Catholic church has come out against yoga. Once again, yoga came to us through Hinduism but is not the property of Hinduism. Yoga predates Hinduism. The catholic church needs to re-evaluate their stance on many things. Yoga and Reiki are just a couple. Keep in mind I was raised catholic and have respect for its teachings. I just think some are way too outdated for modern society to embrace.
Why would the Catholic church not embrace something that has healed and benefited so many such as Reiki and Yoga. This I do not understand.