[QUOTE=Chitta Control;68816]I’ve heard that in India when Indians do yoga they are rarely so concerned with alignment as westerners are.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, I got that as well. I think this realignment business seems to be more of a modern Western thing, than an Indian traditional thing. In my perusal of classical literature on Yoga, including the Hathayogapradapika, I have found nary a reference to ‘realignment’ But I wouldn’t say that the hatha yogis did not care about realignment, surely their guru would have corrected their techniques from time to time, but I doubt it would have been as much as the modern yogi and their teacher think is necessary.
I also have also found nary a mention of group classes of yogis doing asanas together under the supervision of a Guru. I think the reason for this is, Yoga hasn’t really been a social activity or fitness regimen, but a personal spiritual path that one has been initiated into. In Hathayoga in particular, the emphasis has not been on asanas, but more on body control to awaken dormant capabilities and capacities, and asana is simply one technique used to accomplish this.
Yoga in the Western world seems to be something different altogether. Typically when we say I am doing ‘Yoga’ in the West it means we attend classes and do yoga postures together. The purpose is not to master the body and awaken its powers, but improve flexbility, treat a disorder, reduce stress, lose weight, tone up, get fit. It is problematic to even call this ‘yoga’
The yoga that I do(and I do hatha yoga asanas on the side) Kriya yoga, would not even be called yoga by most Western yogis. There is only one asana practice in my routine(Mahamudra) the rest of it is breath and energy work, concentration and meditation. The emphasis, like Hatha yoga, is to awaken the bodies dormant powers and to achieve also the highest goal of self-realization. This is traditionally what would be called 'Yoga’
As Krrya yoga is my spiritual practice, it is personal to me, and I don’t really talk about it with others that much and always practice on my own, at my own pace, usually in solitude.
Similarly, most Western yogis would not call the intellectual self-inquiry and sciptural reading practices of the Vedantin yoga. The traditional Vedantin does not use any physical techniques(asanas, pranayamas etc) The only technique they may use is meditation. Likewise, the devotional practices of the Bhakta/religious person. Yet, the Vedantin and Bhakta’s yoga is proper Yoga in that it is directed towards achieiving self-realization, only their techniques are different.
Yoga has never really been about improving ones flexbility, losing weight, reducing stress or therapy, as it seems to be in the Western world. These, while beneficial effects of yoga practice, mean nothing to the traditional yogi. It has always been a spiritual path for a spiritual aspirant desirious of achieiving the final goal of liberation from samsara - moksha/self realization/god realization. Hence, traditionally I would probably be recognized more as a real yogi, as opposed to the Western yogis socializing with their peers in the studio doing Sun salutations together, and getting their constant realignments by their teacher.