Obvious distinction is that the teacher is teaching a class, and therapist is working one on one. Therapist is tackling the principle of adapting to the individual and designing a program for the individual’s needs. Huge differences of approach and goal here (e.g., Phoenix Rising vs. Structural Yoga Therapy). Is the theme sadhana (i.e., sadhana heals by aligning koshas via second chapter of Patanjali) or psychotherapy or what? My approach is not so much healing (though that is often the client’s goal) as sadhana; adapting the practice to enable one to practice Yoga into the deeper koshas rather than “fixing” particular physical conditions.
Some of my one-time students are between yoga and physical therapy. I?m not looking to provide that, although about half clients are in this category, or have injured themselves doing yoga are want to be fixed.
What is the difference in training for yoga therapists? Functional anatomy and kinesiology is usually missing in YTT’s – the stuff in his book. YT’s know how to present the posture, but don’t know the anatomy that ties it all together – when a student says “my knee hurts in this pose” and teacher doesn’t know what to do with it. To Mukunda, this is remedial work. Certified teachers ought to be taught why the poses are done a particular way and how to adapt for injuries or postural anomalies (knock knees, scoliosis) so that the students are not strained by conforming to standardized postures. The “new material” that he thinks any yoga therapist should know would be the stuff in his book on the kinesiology of Asana.
A large part of what he does is also going beyond Asana: shatkriyas, pranayama and pratyahara – transitional practices taking one toward meditation. His training program is modeled after Krishnamacharya’s approach, going into Ayurveda. lifestyle, and spirituality in later parts of the training.