Two very informative, well articulated and and sincere presentations on Yoga and Christianity
Christianity and Yoga from a Christian perspective: http://christianspracticingyoga.com/wp/
Christianity and Yoga from a Hindu perspective:
http://www.hinduwisdom.info/Yoga_and_Hindu_Philosophy.htm#Hostility to Yoga in Church
I was surprised by how sincere, accurate and honest the Christian presentation above was. It certainly did a lot to show some of the similarities between Yoga and Christianity and helped me appreciate them. However, I did find that many times, some of the similarities were tenuously drawn. For example calling the Christian contemplative tradition in the monastic order “meditation” This is not meditation, anymore than reading a book is meditation. The aim of meditation is not fill your mind with thoughts by thinking intensely, but to empty the mind of thoughts through complete suspension of thought.
This presentation also makes a case which is being echoed here that Yoga is not denominational and is not exclusive to any particular religion: Hinduism, Buddhism or Jainism. It does not prescribe faith in any particular deity. It is a spiritual program for self-development for living a fuller life and cultivating our highest potentials, and is based on scientific observation. Therefore it is measurable, predictable and neutral.
There is no dispute at all that Yoga is a vigorous science and it is a very powerful system of mind-body training, with tremendous benefits, but the point that it is not Hindu is very contentious and hinges on what the definition of Hinduism is. It is an open and shut case that Yoga is not Hinduism, if Hinduism is defined as the worship of Indian deities like Shiva, Rama, Ganesha, Durga, Kali, Hanuman etc. However, this rather than being a definition of Hinduism, is a misconception and stereotype about Hinduism held by ignorant people, and is not what is officially recognised to be Hinduism. The official definition of Hinduism recognises Hinduism as non-denominational, non-prophetic(i.e., no prophets or founders) and non-dogmatic(no fixed deities, rituals, moral codes and clergy).
In fact what is recognised to be Hinduism is based on general philosophies and practices that all denominations within Hinduism share. They are as enumerated before
- The doctrine of Self and Self-realization through Yoga
- The doctrine of the law of karma and reincarnation
- The doctrine of law of dharma
- the doctrine of the complex cosmology and anatomy of the universe and body
- The doctrine of the student-teacher tradition
There is no single Hinduism denomination that does not share the above 5. So these 5 general doctrines are what define Hinduism. You know you are talking to a Hindu if they subscribe to these doctrines. But these are also the doctrines that a Yogi subscribes too. In other words a Hindu and a Yogi are equivalent terms and refer to exactly the same philosophy and practice.
Therefore can a Christian be a Yogi? No more than a square can be a circle. Rather than debating this point to death, we simply should accept Christianity does not teach Yoga philosophy and practice. It simply is not an enlightened enough tradition as Yoga is and it fails to satisfy the spiritual hunger of humans. This is why it is been strongly rejected in the past century and why Hinduism via the pseudonom of Yoga is replacing it. Humanity is returning back to its real natural religious roots: Hinduism.
Christianity, Judasim and Islam and even Buddhisms are corruptions of the natural religion of Hinduism. They all evolved out of Hinduism during the descent phase of Kali yuga, and are all now returning to Hinduism during the ascent phase towards Satya yuga. There is no question about it, we are all becoming Hindu - slowly but surely.