Of specific 3s and of single pyramids:
Of specific 3s the level of three in the 81 scales is by the same dimensions when adding the level above compared to the single triangular pyramid in general here.
Of specific 3s for 9 and of single pyramids for a square base pyramid, 9 creates easy to understand as conceptual hexagon within the 81 scales at/by the level of 9 so symbolically a four base triangular pyramid or 4 skillful scales represents the startup as something conceptual by being in a place that is reasonably reachable now as a hexagon aligned reasonably throughout focus as time for level of 9
Of specific 3s for 27, 27 is more balanced separated. Of singular pyramids for a pyramid of 5, five is more balance as one group of scales but done skillfully being contrasted to one 3 of 9 groups.
Of specific separate 3s for 81 and of singular pyramids for a scanning for analysis of 6, there is no 3d scaling for 6 unless part of 81 or if skillful use is done. This is pointing out how notably 60 60 60 triangles will not create a gap volume between the 6 sided base and isolated center point at a different depth. Notably 60 60 60 triangles as scales bring the most balance height capacity for the 3, 4, 5 sided base pyramids with 60 60 60 triangle sides
Golden ratio. When noticing the previous dimensions in this comment we can notice that 3 and 4 triangle sided pyramids give us some correlations. When noticing one golden ratio number linearly from 1 to 144 then we have 12 of them and there are twelve tips from 3 triangular base pyramids. So the triangles that create sides of the square bast pyramid have 12 tips in a separated way especially and the sum of the displacements between the tips of the first and the second and then between the second and the third add up to 15 which is how many sides come from the 5 separated triangle tips of the pentagon base pyramid.
And interestingly 144 divided by 6 sides is 24 segments in a side and 24 is like 21 the last number of the second pyramid plus three which gives us a range leading to 2 being a specific path to the middle likely and then 3 being the range of three pyramids like how 900 might be derived to find a number at a more specific range of between 700 to 900 of three sets of 300 or more specific in the tens or ones next of course. And 2 pyramids times 6 of those ranges of two pyramids can give us 12 pyramids which is like having a pyramid inside each of the twelve tips of an overall three pyramids. Three groups of 48 tips is like that as well.