[QUOTE=CityMonk;46018]One can see a lot of references to different souses that recite patanjali’s sutras.
“one can mistake pain for pleasure and pleasure for pain.”
I’m having a hard time to come up with an example. Any suggestions on how one can think about pain as a pleasure? (lets exclude perverts here:)[/QUOTE]
These are subtle, I think, but not really for us.
There are things in Hatha yoga, for example, where you may think that you’re seriously achieving a level a flexibility, very uncomfortable positions for the individual, their ego is gratified by both the position and the discomfort that their body is feeling. Meanwhile they would probably be much better served by easing off on their physical practice and being easier with their body.
Likewise, sitting & practicing in positions that one thinks is required, such as half lotus or full lotus, but are uncomfortable to the individual and keep the awareness at the surface and constantly on the body not to say having awareness of the body is bad, but forcing yourself to have constant awareness of discomfort isn’t the goal
Mistaking pleasure as pain… this could also apply to Hatha but I think when one experiences certain internal processes or stages of progress, shedding certain identification or attachments, then the ego lashes back and you think “I don’t like this, this is really uncomfortable, this hurts”. However the liberation is truly freeing and pleasurable.
These can be as subtle as the difference between apprehension and excitement or even the cup half full versus half empty. Even the ache for a greater experience can be uncomfortable or even seem painful and yet it is said that to be in some point of transcendent consciousness and to have a burning desire for more, this is the best.
in the Yoga Patanjali, it is said in Pada II Sutra 1 that “Austerity, study of the Self and surrender to the Supreme Being are the actions that stabilize Union.” This seems to me to be the core of what could be this kind of confusion. If one studies ethics and specifically John Stewart Mill’s Utilitarianism, there is a contrast between the pleasures of a pig and the pleasures of a man, the capacity for greater and more complex pleasures that at one point you may find boring or even uncomfortable but in the end, these actions yield greater pleasure over such a longer period of time.
(This is in addition to the effect where one’s “experience” during meditation seems to change but what is really happening, ultimately, is that nothing is changing but the meditators’ position or point of view with respect to Brahman, nothing more).
One could do yoga & meditation with a strict guru for a decade or one could do top-shelf drugs & have daily orgies for a decade. One may seem pleasurable and one may seem uncomfortable, but after a decade, when your guru says,“I have nothing else to teach you, now go share what you know with others”, bows low to you and shows you the door… what would your experience be? Pain, or pleasure?
After a decade of drug & sex “piggy” pleasures, what will your experience be when it ends? Pleasure or pain?
Pada II 14 & 15 comment on this more, pain or pleasure is largely from your point of view. To gain, one must lose. Freedom from the ego’s confinements comes through enjoyment and yet we know it can be uncomfortable.
I think the point here is that one can’t really trust Waking State opinions on what is pleasure or pain, so don’t get off the path or stop your practice. Stick with it regardless of what you might think your opinion of things is or whether you like what is happening or not because ultimately we know “this too shall pass”!