[QUOTE=AmirMourad;59550]“It is obvious why Buddhism has the same philosophies and practices - because it an off-shoot of Hinduism.”
That is not the fundamental reason - it is because both the Hindus and the Buddhists have been investigating into the same realities, although their words, descriptions, and interpretations may be different.
There were no Buddhists before the Hindus. Buddha was born a Hindu, had a Hindu upbrining and Hindu gurus. His teachings were also very Hindu. Later, a religion started by others called Buddhism was formed after him based on how they interpreted his teachings. Mahayana Buddhism remained faithful to Hinduism while Thervada went its separate way. Eventually, it went to South East Asia, because the Indians were not buying it.
And it is not something unique to the traditions that have happened in India. The Ancient Egyptians were as deeply involved in the spiritual sciences and the work of the expansion of consciousness as the Hindus. That they were aware of “reincarnation” is not because they were imitating the Hindus, it is because once you penetrate into the deep levels of the unconscious, one can remember past lives, at times with minute detail. And if there have been past lives, certainly there are going to be future lives. That there are various levels of energy within man which constitute the same levels of energy within the universe itself, from the “physical”, to the “astral”, to the “spiritual” - is not unique either. What the Hindus referred to as the sukshma sarira is basically the same as what the ancient Egyptians called the Ka. What was known as prana amongst the Hindus, was known as Chi amongst the Chinese, mana amongst the Polynesians, and Pneuma amongst the Greeks. Pythagoras also spoke of the same knowledge, which he likely learned from Egypt, and which he waited for several years to become initiated into the mystery schools. And there is a reason why modern archeologists have found the discoveries in Egypt to be a mystery - because there are certain things which are of such mathematical precision, as well as astronomically precise, that they are considered monumental even by today’s standards, and in some cases, extending beyond even what modern science is capable.
This is easily explained by borrowing from the Hindus. By the time these cultures were talking of these things, Yoga was a highly developed science in India with thousands of years of history. Many scholars have stated, for example, that Pythagoras had borrowed his philosophy from India. The first time the 5 element theory, Pythagorean theorem, transmigration of the soul, vegetarianism, wearing orange appears in Greece is via Pythagoras and by that time they were very ancient ideas in India. There was contact between the Greeks and the Indians via the Persians and India was trading with Egypt etc.
The Greeks even record how their philosophers went to the East to learn. In that time there were formal schools, colleges and univerisities in India, who also took on board foreign students.
The Greeks themselves records Hindus visiting Greece and sharing their philosophy. Later Clement of Alexandria openly admits Greek philosophy was “stolen from the barbarbians - Hindus”
Truth is universal, it does not belong to any tradition, philosophy, or religion. Existence itself is not Hindu anymore than the trees, mountains, and rivers are Hindu. Unless one drops these identifications which are just intended to protect one’s limited identity, and become receptive to a force which is far beyond your own ego, then one has yet to come to the maturity that is needed in the search for Truth.
We don’t need to invoke these mystical Jungian theories of sharing ideas because of the collective unconsciousness. It can be easily explained by physical contact between the ancient cultures - which we know for a fact went on.