What's Samadhi for?

[QUOTE=YogiAdam;33175]I suppose your right. I used to be a support worker for people with chronic Schizophrenia, so I should be a bit more sensitive to issues like this.[/QUOTE]

And there you have it violence against another person because their viewpoint does not conform to your own. What you said above is no different to the Christians first landing in the pagan lands and feeling sympathy for them because they did not know the “truth”. And you say you are not a religious believer and have no faith? :wink: You are full of it mate. You are just as dogmatic, faithful and condescending as the Christians you love to hate

Yes, I am sorry to confirm this as a christian. You non-christian guys are pretty much fubared, lol.

Come on, it’s not this simple. :slight_smile:

[QUOTE=Hubert;33179]Yes, I am sorry to confirm this as a christian. You non-christian guys are pretty much fubared, lol.

Come on, it’s not this simple. :)[/QUOTE]

:stuck_out_tongue:

Yeah, fortunately many modern Chrisitians do not think like this. It is still a big dogma in orthodox Catholic Christianity though.

[QUOTE=Surya Deva;33178]And there you have it violence against another person because their viewpoint does not conform to your own.[/QUOTE]

violence

Pronunciation:/ˈvʌɪəl(ə)ns/
noun
[mass noun]
1 behaviour involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something

There you go. A free english lesson :smiley:

[QUOTE=YogiAdam;33184]violence

Pronunciation:/ˈvʌɪəl(ə)ns/
noun
[mass noun]
1 behaviour involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something

There you go. A free english lesson :D[/QUOTE]

There is something called mental violence where one abuses somebody verbally designed to hurt or damage them. Don’t worry, I am not so fragile, to be hurt by your attempt at violence against me :smiley: I just find it hilarious though how much it exposes your religious tendencies.

It is said that if you dislike something it reflects something about you. Your dislike for religion(mainly Christianity) is your own dislike for your own religious tendencies :wink:

Three very common traits of a religious believer

  1. Intolerance. Intolerance for contrary beliefs. This often leads to verbal or physical violence.
  2. Irrationality. A refusal to consider or look at any evidence or arguments which contradict ones beliefs
  3. Dogma. The belief that ones beliefs are right and self-evident. They are not open to any kind of questioning.

You fit the bill dawg :wink: So does Pawel, but Pawel openly accepts he is religious and wants to keep religion and science apart forever(typical catholic lol) You on the other hand pretend you are not, when your actions speak volumes to the contrary.

Yeah, fortunately many modern Chrisitians do not think like this. It is still a big dogma in orthodox Catholic Christianity though.[/quote]

And I too do believe it’s true. Just that to comprehend it one needs to raise his spirit above religious, national or geographical apartenance. And one needs more than eastern wisdom. The universality of the christian message does not mean that christians are better than non-christians. There should be no difference between a true human being and a true christian. There should be no difference between a true human being and a true yogi. But this does not make yoga and christianity equal. It does not make any of them better than the other. It definitley does not make one of them true and the other one false.

Rather, both are true, down to the last sentence. Yes. How can that be ? Now this is what all of us should be concerned with.

[QUOTE=Hubert;33191]And I too do believe it’s true. Just that to comprehend it one needs to raise his spirit above religious, national or geographical apartenance. And one needs more than eastern wisdom. The universality of the christian message does not mean that christians are better than non-christians. There should be no difference between a true human being and a true christian. There should be no difference between a true human being and a true yogi. But this does not make yoga and christianity equal. It does not make any of them better than the other. It definitley does not make one of them true and the other one false.

Rather, both are true, down to the last sentence. Yes. How can that be ? Now this is what all of us should be concerned with.[/QUOTE]

Yeah, the science of spirituality and the universal truths has remained the same. Throughout the ages various masters have instructed humanity in this science the Vedic Risis, Krishna, Mahavira, Buddha, Lao-Tzu, Shankara, Confuscius, Shamans, Druids, Jesus, Babaji, Guru Nanak, Kabir, Ramakrishna, Yogananda, Ramana Maharishi and countless mystics and sages.

The problem starts with the natural human tendency for secetarianism where they want to believe either one of them is more right than the other and their path is more right than the other. As is the case with so many misguided Christians who think Jesus is the only way and simply accepting him as their lord and saviour is enough for salvation. When humans begin to care more about the author than the actual message that is when they go astray.

The message is simple you can be just as great as these masters if you awaken the potentials within you through spiritual practice(some form of Yoga)

There’s a first…100…lol:D

Looks like i was mistaken …i just noticed the christianity thread. And i seem to recall the marjuana & yoga thread had a lot of reads on it too.Zzzzzzzzzzzz

[SIZE=2]Very interesting.
[/SIZE]

Surya Deva,

You’re definitely a jnana yogi to fear.Very powerful,yes.

The problem starts with the natural human tendency for secetarianism where they want to believe either one of them is more right than the other and their path is more right than the other. As is the case with so many misguided Christians who think Jesus is the only way and simply accepting him as their lord and saviour is enough for salvation. When humans begin to care more about the author than the actual message that is when they go astray.
This seems to be the major problem with religion.You seemed to cover some of the main points beautifullly & logically…lol. Intoleraance to other’s viewpoints,dogma and so on.

[QUOTE=core789;33204]Surya Deva,

You’re definitely a jnana yogi to fear.Very powerful,yes.[/QUOTE]

lol Classic!:smiley:

Lol…:roll: :roll:

Good to battle it out with the best of them…

Thanks core789 :smiley:

I am ready to leave jnana yoga now. I have become sick of reading books and intellectualizing now. I have been doing for that 10 years. Do you think Jnana yoga can lead to enlightenment or only just show the way to Yoga? I am finding that it has only shown me the way to Yoga. I understand the theory right from the atom to Brahman. But now I want actual direct experience.

Sounds like yogic spiritual science is indeed is the perfect antidote to the overly rational thinking mind. Particularly if you are or have been an academic, and especially western philosophy and it’s quagmire.

You sound right on track.

Yes i think jnana yoga could but highly unlikely for most people especially a westerner . I think your trainings in jnana have served you really wel to look further.

I f you stayed at my house for 3 months it’s possible i might be able to teach you alot.

You are lookiing right at tne end of upir nose, right just where you should be. Alot of folk live in their mind, to their own detriment or limitation. The do no realise their full potentiality and possibility because the thinking mind is always evaluating and wants to play along with those games. As you know this gets in the way of pure consciousness and a relaxed state which is like the bed for transfromations in yoga.There is also a lotf conditioning that stops folk from praciticcing yoga & returning to our natural state.Our brains and our consciousness could be expanding faster thn they are but for some reason a whole host of things gets in the way and we allow that to happen on a daily basis.Like you say it is tapping into a faster rate of evolution that can be done on a daily basis systematically using every available means and gradually. It is very exciting.

It is not even that difificult once you know how. Once you’re armed with the requisite knowledge and some experience. Some dediciation and setting up new habits are followed.

You’ve found the ‘get out clause’.This gets us out of the treadmill which is normal consciousness bound to limitation and conditioning and provides us with a vehicle which carries us to freedon and ultimately another land.

Indeed it sounds like your jnana yoga trainings may well have been enough to pull the veil away from the eyes.You are making excellent progress. You’re looking for more. Yes there is so much more than just this. Don’t settle for medicrity. You are a King. And you are free to do whatever you want so you can evolve mindfully and harmoniously with that of the cosmos.

There is obviouslly more than just what we just see with our eyes.The journey is and should be be just as enjoyable as the reaching of our destination.

The whole of yogic science is like one giant interesting buffet. How we arrive at discovering our true nature can take a number of paths but the pricniples are the same.And there are common methods.Praciting a little each day is all that’s enough to ove forward. It is all valuable experience and knowledge that is gained .

I have met a number of academics mainly & philosophy lecturers and tutors who would benefit if they studied some yoga & meditation. I’m not saying this is you, as i think you have demonstarrted athat you seem to have a clear understanding of the illusions and traps of western thinking & philosphy.Folk that live too much in their head could benenfit from meditation and other yogic practices.i.e overly intellectual types that refuse to think outside the box, are too rational. Are permanently confused because they are lost in the circuitious trappings of the thinking mind etc. I’m not saying this is you but alot of academia. That is why they say often great discoveries are made outside of ivory towers because they are not affected by tradition and peer research, influence & pressures. They are free to think outisde the box. Many geniuses were independents and did not have to unlearn whatever preconceptions others held.So when folk come up with new ideas or ways of looking at stuff it often involves debunking at least a great deal of what has been said by others.Or looking at things afresh and new, without the shades.

[QUOTE=Surya Deva;33234]Thanks core789 :smiley:

I am ready to leave jnana yoga now. I have become sick of reading books and intellectualizing now. I have been doing for that 10 years. Do you think Jnana yoga can lead to enlightenment or only just show the way to Yoga? I am finding that it has only shown me the way to Yoga. I understand the theory right from the atom to Brahman. But now I want actual direct experience.[/QUOTE]

I’m just typical intolerant, irrational and dogmatic catholic, but I had few thoughts and decided to share anyway.

I think you are experiencing a sort of enlightenment on mental level. And you have a lot of direct experience – of intellectual/mental constructs. Stating for example that you understand theory right from atom to Brahman - this is a sort of enlightenment, on mental/intellectual level. I think there are several types of enlightenment –at each different level of existence. Higher the level the greater and deeper sense of “light” (of everything that enlightenment represents).

I don’t think any type of enlightenment results in TOTAL knowledge of the universe. E.g. how from many molecules this table you are using is composed of. Or does it? I’m searching for highly enlightened people to check that. Anyone here had such experience of total knowledge?

Core789, yes I must admit living too much in your head is a huge trap. It is even worse than materialism and hedonism. I am starting to come out of this academic trap now. I realise philosophy is not for its own sake, but it is rather a map. Besides who needs anymore maps after reading Samkhya. Samkhya easily is the greatest philosophy ever produced. However Samkhya is just pure inference. It is Yoga where one can directly experience all the realities Samkhya enumerates. I must say I have not been completely bereft of experience. I had quite a few supersensible experiences, but they have been spontaneous and short lived. I am now ready to commit myself to Yoga and not read another book! I have about 100 books in my library and read so many books as part of my academic training. This is why I am ready to renounce all of this and surrender to a living master and his instructions.

[QUOTE=Pawel;33240]I’m just typical intolerant, irrational and dogmatic catholic, but I had few thoughts and decided to share anyway.

I think you are experiencing a sort of enlightenment on mental level. And you have a lot of direct experience – of intellectual/mental constructs. Stating for example that you understand theory right from atom to Brahman - this is a sort of enlightenment, on mental/intellectual level. I think there are several types of enlightenment –at each different level of existence. Higher the level the greater and deeper sense of “light” (of everything that enlightenment represents).

I don’t think any type of enlightenment results in TOTAL knowledge of the universe. E.g. how from many molecules this table you are using is composed of. Or does it? I’m searching for highly enlightened people to check that. Anyone here had such experience of total knowledge?[/QUOTE]

True enlightenment would lead to absolute knowledge. There is nothing that one would not know. I was watching a discourse by Paramhansa Nityananda(yes the one who had a scandal recently) and he mentioned how he could see all the sun, stars, planets and galaxies when his guru showed him a technique(samyama on a nadi) by simply pressing on the nadi when he looked up at the sky he could see this all. He explained the reason this was possible was because he had completely arrested the movement of his eyes(through the nadi) and as a result the eyes could see through the illusory blue layer of the sky into space.

I have no reason to doubt his experience. I have had experiences where I have seen atoms(so has the physicist and philosopher of science Fritjof capra)

I guess I agree intellectual knowledge is a kind of enlightenment. It is a shallow enlightenment though because theory is always only 1% and 99% is practice.