I’m not saying the church doesn’t do anything to help the poor. They do, and I realize that. All I’m saying is they could do more. Do you really need all those expensive statues, pictures, stained glass, gold chalices, and cloths to properly worship? You can be in awe of God without all of that. None of that matters at all.
My own church looks like a gymnasium with a few cheap statues here and there. We could sure use some “adornment.”
The ornate churches on the east coast have been around for a long time, and the expense spread out over many years–sometimes hundreds of years. No, we don’t “need” them, and we don’t need to live in nice houses either. We could get by living in a little hut or a tent and give the rest away.
I am happy for whatever “adornment” we have, and wish we had more. I wish we could spend more money on better singing and musicians. The money is well-spent, and those statues and stained glass windows, and whatever else, last a long long time, to be enjoyed by many. And they are more than just window dressing, but are methods of teaching, and aids to worship.
One could criticize the Buddhist who sits in meditation for five hours. Why doesn’t he instead get off his butt and do something useful to help others?
Or could it be that by his meditation that he can be most useful?