[QUOTE=AmirMourad;57035] a method is totally necessary, and without a method the chances of coming to more awareness are like the chances of swallowing the ocean. [/QUOTE]
Okay…but what is that method ?
[QUOTE=om_namah_shivay;57037]Okay…but what is that method ?[/QUOTE]
Amir doesn’t know the method.
Because he
-
is a 25 year old punk kid.
-
is a well read fraud and parrot of others words. (including mine)
-
is not in knowledge.
-
Hasn’t trodden the path therefore he gives no precise method. He instead speaks in ambiguity and grays based on things he’s read.
-
Has no higher authority to teach anything.
-
claims he is awakened but gives no definition or method. Nor can he elucidate the visual signs. He instead speaks in ambiguity and grays based on the things he’s read.
-
disparages the masters.
-
tells people not to read scripture
-
puts himself on youtube giving ‘sermons’
-
gathers chelas when he himself is un - accomplished.
-
is a slick talking shyster.
-
copy cats me…
If you read around you will find him parroting and elaborating on what I say. Others do it as well. The others I do not mind.
I gave the method. On the prior page. Will this work for you?
No. Most likely not.
You got to “turn everything on”. This is done through your practice of the limbs of yoga.
Beyond that I will not say “how” to turn everything on as you are not my student and this information should not be willy nilly tossed about the internet as some tool box like Amir Moron can get ahold of the information and use it to aggrandize his egoity and gather chelas (disciples).
Plus it’s a big subject!
Read up and study as much as is comfortable. Establish your own practice. Go take some yogasana classes. If after time you desire in your heart for something more . . . go find an authentic lineage that emphasis the techniques and not the guru - to receive initiation into.
[QUOTE=The Scales;57111] You got to “turn everything on”. This is done through your practice of the limbs of yoga.
[/QUOTE]
Yes. You are right.
I have started trying just that.
Okay let me tell which of those limbs I find difficult & which of them [B]comparatively[/B] easy.
Green = Easy (in comparison)
Red = Difficult.
[U]Yama[/U]
Ahimsa
Satya
Asteya
Brahmacharya
Aparigah
Kshama
Dhruti
Daya
Aarjav
Mitahar
[U]Niyama [/U]
Shoucha - Purity (Dhouti, Basti, Neti, Tratak, Nouli and Kapalbhati)
Santosh
Tapa I still don't understand what it is.
Swadhyaya (Japa) Haven't tried it yet.
Eshwar Pranidhan
[U]Asana[/U]
Some I find easy while I am struggling to perfect others.
[U]Pranayam[/U]
Pratyahara
Dharana
Dhyan
Samadhi
Its a long & difficult path !!!
[QUOTE=om_namah_shivay;57118]Yes. You are right.
I have started trying just that.
Okay let me tell which of those limbs I find difficult & which of them [B]comparatively[/B] easy.
Green = Easy (in comparison)
Red = Difficult.
[U]Yama[/U]
Ahimsa
Satya
Asteya
Brahmacharya
Aparigah
Kshama
Dhruti
Daya
Aarjav
Mitahar
[U]Niyama [/U]
Shoucha - Purity (Dhouti, Basti, Neti, Tratak, Nouli and Kapalbhati)
Santosh
Tapa I still don't understand what it is.
Swadhyaya (Japa) Haven't tried it yet.
Eshwar Pranidhan
[U]Asana[/U]
Some I find easy while I am struggling to perfect others.
[U]Pranayam[/U]
Pratyahara
Dharana
Dhyan
Samadhi
Its a long & difficult path !!![/QUOTE]
The wise have said the Yamas and Niyamas are the foundations. Or another analogy is they are the factors that help the seed grow into the tree.
The rain, the minerals, the sun, the warmth, the drainage, the soil…
Om Namah,
“Okay…but what is that method ?”
There are a thousand and one skillful means. My approach has been through meditation.
“The wise have said the Yamas and Niyamas are the foundations.”
. These “yamas” and “niyamas” are not to be interpreted as absolutes, they are just useful strategies. Not only do different traditions have different interpretations as to what their terms mean, but there are even some traditions which have been doing what appears to be just the opposite of these yamas and niyamas.
You see how he is?
He disparages the wise…
He doesn’t give a method other than “meditation” which is about as ambiguous as it gets.
Plus there are not a thousand and one skillfull means . . . more like a couple that can be combined. and NONE of them have anything to do with ‘mediation’ in the yogic sense sense of the word. Nor do they have anything to do with new agey fingers up the spine or shaktipat.
Amir. You are a punk kid.
You are 25 years old.
You really don’t have anything to share
You don’t know shit. at all.
[B]25 years old![/B]
@scales
All I have till now is tell you guys whats not working. Sorry about that.
Let me tell you whats working.
Its [B]Tratak[/B]. I am concentrating at the third eye.
After doing it for say 15mins or say I am experiencing a sense of calm.
Scales,
"He disparages the wise… "
I have not disparaged anybody, I have just said that there are relative skillful means, there is no absolute method. And if you want - I can give you countless different examples as to why this is so.
“He doesn’t give a method other than “meditation” which is about as ambiguous as it gets”
If you want it to be less ambiguous, spend less time running around seeking attention and more time in practice.
“You are 25 years old.”
Again, wisdom and experience is not a matter of time. There are people who are eighty five years of age, and they are still psychologically not more than perhaps fifteen years old. Their body continued growing, but inwardly they stagnated. Just as it is possible for somebody who is old to be asleep, it is possible for somebody young to be awake. It is not a question of time at all.
Om,
That is good if it is true, continue practicing it. It will sharpen your concentration. But do not be surprised if it may take some time. But so far, the practice of concentration is not meditation. When your attention is flowing with one-pointedness over a certain span of time, eventually the effort of the mind disappears, and you will enter into spontaneous meditation. But it requires your attention to be uninterrupted and unbroken - a constant current without any gaps.
[QUOTE=om_namah_shivay;57165]@scales
All I have till now is tell you guys whats not working. Sorry about that.
Let me tell you whats working.
Its [B]Tratak[/B]. I am concentrating at the third eye.
After doing it for say 15mins or say I am experiencing a sense of calm.[/QUOTE]
I would say this is quite good. The spot should be between the eyes up just a little - a tad.
Do you know why your doing this? and how it does what it do?
[QUOTE=The Scales;57153]
You are 25 years old.
You really don’t have anything to share
[/QUOTE]
Hej Scales,
I’m not looking to get involved in this argument, but I’m curious to know how you think about the links between age, experience and knowledge? Are the requirements for attaining a high level of skill/proficiency (or whichever word is better to use here) directly connected to someone’s age, or to the number of years a person has studied or practiced a certain subject?
I have been thinking a lot about this regarding something which is not very much related to yoga at all (or this thread, OT, sorry!) and am interested in all points of views regarding learning - teaching - age - experience…
I knew you’d pull the wisdom has no number card.
You are a punk kid.
You have no wisdom.
Also IDIOT. If you haven’t figured it out yet. I don’t need to practice.
I think I’ll copy and paste my summary of you from above so I can save it and put it on as a reply to every stupid post you make which is most of them.
You have nothing of value to share.
at this time
your knowledge is crap.
I’m actually helping you by being mean and nasty.
You have no freaking clue.
and
I Will continue to school you.
Also never ever elaborate on my posts again. I write exactly what I write for a reason.
I however will continue to trash your stupid posts.
[QUOTE=Nila;57178]Hej Scales,
[B]I’m not looking to get involved in this argument, but I’m curious to know how you think about the links between age, experience and knowledge? Are the requirements for attaining a high level of skill/proficiency (or whichever word is better to use here) directly connected to someone’s age, or to the number of years a person has studied or practiced a certain subject? [/B]
I have been thinking a lot about this regarding something which is not very much related to yoga at all (or this thread, OT, sorry!) and am interested in all points of views regarding learning - teaching - age - experience…[/QUOTE]
I would say there are several factors that combine in variable degrees that equate to ‘proficiency’ at a skill.
Intelligence.
Time spent in practice.
Focus.
[QUOTE=AmirMourad;57172]Om,
That is good if it is true, continue practicing it. It will sharpen your concentration. But do not be surprised if it may take some time. But so far, the practice of concentration is not meditation. When your attention is flowing with one-pointedness over a certain span of time, eventually the effort of the mind disappears, and you will enter into spontaneous meditation. But it requires your attention to be uninterrupted and unbroken - a constant current without any gaps.[/QUOTE]
This is a lie. At all times there is SOME effort of the mind via the will in regards to meditation.
At all times.
[QUOTE=The Scales;57181]I would say there are several factors that combine in variable degrees that equate to ‘proficiency’ at a skill.
Intelligence.
Time spent in practice.
Focus.[/QUOTE]
Would you care to elaborate on the intelligence part?
[QUOTE=AmirMourad;57171]Scales,
"He disparages the wise… "
I have not disparaged anybody, I have just said that there are relative skillful means, there is no absolute method. And if you want - I can give you countless different examples as to why this is so.
[B]THe Scales says no I don’t want your crap. Shove it. You disparage the wise all the time. Call them liars. Undermine the teachings. Your a chump. Plain and simple. [/B]
“He doesn’t give a method other than “meditation” which is about as ambiguous as it gets”
If you want it to be less ambiguous, spend less time running around seeking attention and more time in practice.
"[B]I dont’ need any teaching from a child. Your an idiot. A fraud and a phoney.
Thats why you make things ambiguous. Dum. Dum. Dum. and never give specific examples beyond what can be found in a book.
Why would I listen to your teaching? I wouldn’t. Also. Moron. I punked your stupid 1001 and techniques.
There are but a couple. [B]and I know what they are and how to combine them. They don’t involve meditation - which is what I said. You don’t speak on that though. [/B][/B]
[B]You seriously can’t be this lame. I hope you realize that there are many on here that see you as a complete gnome and lamer. [/B]
You have got to get up real early and eat your wheaties to even approach my spiritual jock. But still you will fail.
You are a child. You can’t win. I will trounce you again and again.
“You are 25 years old.”
Again, wisdom and experience is not a matter of time. There are people who are eighty five years of age, and they are still psychologically not more than perhaps fifteen years old. Their body continued growing, but inwardly they stagnated. Just as it is possible for somebody who is old to be asleep, it is possible for somebody young to be awake. It is not a question of time at all.
[B]You don’t even know what you don’t know.
You are just a baby. Go suck your lolly pop and play with your G.I. Joes or legos or whatever it is you play with.
25 years old and thinks he’s figured something out.
Preposterous. [/B]
[/QUOTE]
[B]also
Let me make this perfectly clear to you so you can understand it.
Becaues thus far you clearly haven’t gotten it yet.
You are literally a child.
you have NOTHING to teach me about spiritual matters.
AT ALL. EVER.
Your knowledge is wrong.
Your an arrogant prick.
I could take you being an arrogant prick if your knowledge was right.
I can take you being an idiot if you were humble and kind.
I can’t take you being both an asshole and an idiot, and a champion of delusion.
Plus your a kid.
and a chump.
Thats why I zero in on you.[/B]
[QUOTE=Nila;57185]Would you care to elaborate on the intelligence part?[/QUOTE]
Perhaps if one were smarter than another, and with all variables being equal, (which is unlikely) the smarter of the two - would learn and get better faster.
Thats not to say the slower of the two couldn’t eventually be good, great, or even better - as there other factors involved.
[QUOTE=The Scales;57176]Do you know why your doing this? and how it does what it do?[/QUOTE]
Well I know, being a part of niyama it prepares you by increasing your ability to concentrate.
Please tell me the precise benefits.
[QUOTE=om_namah_shivay;57225]Well I know, being a part of niyama it prepares you by increasing your ability to concentrate.
Please tell me the precise benefits.[/QUOTE]
For the noobie through the practice of fixed gazes some of the various “psychic head centers” become harmonized.
Ajna is one. and at this particular stage the important one.
“concentration can be strengthened.”
Thats all for now.