[QUOTE=TeeA;49690]I do not advocate that you take it lightly. Rather I advocate that there are better options than the ones that you are using. I am moved and joyous at the protest we see rocking the Arab world now. It is wonderful to see people who are fed up with their leaders and confident in their own persons to state so. As a Christian Brethren, peaceful demonstrations have always been a part of our denomination. We were tarred and feathered, tortured, and killed by the Catholics and Lutherans during the Reformation for our peaceful beliefs. (We also refused to follow the doctrine set forth by those denominations) During the Civil, War and WWI we were targets of government oppression due to our non violence(and anti war stances). Today, thanks to those who suffered before us we are legally protected under the law from being drafted in to active military service, and many of our other Anabaptist brethren are as well. Did we go to war over this? No! Did we engage in slamming the other side? No! Rather we used dialogue, peaceful protesting, and lived a life that reflected our peaceful views. (Leading by example is always the best)
Agreed, bearing abuse consistently does not solve the problem. But neither does complaining, flaming the opposition or pointing the finger. This is not mean I believe that the British are not responsible for many of the problems in India rather that at some point there needs to be action taken by the victims in question. It is the same as women. At what point do “I” as a women enable someone to “treat” me as a victim? It is when I blame my actions and responses on those who hurt me in the first place. If I actively work to refuse to let it bother me, then I am no longer a victim, because I no longer enable their opinions or actions to affect me or my life.
Good, but not at the expense of attacking the opposition. (whether physically or rhetorically) Both MLK and Gandhi spoke out against the injustices being caused to them, they did not point fingers and say “They are biased” or “Their religion is the biggest obstacle to progress in the world” It is better not to blame, but rather to rise above the pain and injustice caused to something much better. If all humans strived for this mark, the world would be a much better place to live.
You misinterpreted,. I did not say to wallow in suffering.
I feel discrimination takes place when the person in question is treated unfairly due to a basis of prejudice. So if a woman decides to wear a burqa so be it. But if she is required to as a way to undermine her personal freedoms, then no. That would be discrimination. To deny someone any freedom due to gender, race, age, disabilities, or nationality is absurd.
Most of the Christians I associate with would not consider your beliefs as paganism, polytheism or idolatry. In fact many of them would enjoy open, peaceful dialogue as a way to learn and love a large portion of mankind.
This I did not realize, but if that is the case then it is not the Christian Euro centrist that you should be upset with, but those that run the school systems. After all they are the ones who have the final say in curriculum and texts. As for the face of Western media, that is changing form even as we speak. No longer is the media run only by large companies that censor information before it hit’s the newsstands. We have blogs, twitter, and forums. And while it may be self gratifying in the short term to flame or discredit those of the western media/mind set; it only in the end makes people of a more sober mind want to ignore you. Rather it is better to point out when the facts are wrong, and not attack even when you are attacked yourself. By not responding, you add credibility to your argument and foolishness to theirs.
“Silence is one of the hardest arguments to refute.” Josh Billings
Nameste
TeeA[/QUOTE]
Really? What better options are there than intellectually undermining the very religions that denigrate us on a daily basis and raising awareness of their evils and promoting a reform within those religions? Peaceful protest? That is precisely what Hindus did for over a millennia and look what happened. You see, peaceful protest and tolerance has been a hallmark of our brethren for thousands of years, a tradition that far predates your “religion” (which has caused so much harm and suffering in this world). India was consistently invaded by Muslims who did nothing but pillage Hindu temples, rape our women, slaughter Hindus, and covert Hindus to Islam. Did we go to war over this? No! Did we engage in slamming the other side? No! Not when we knew that our protesting would result in our wives getting raped and our tongues being cut off. Then the Christian British came in on their merry way, took advantage of our instability and turned what was one of the most prosperous nations in the world into one of the most poorest. Did we go to war over this? No! Did we engage in slamming the other side? No! Sure there was resistance but the vast majority of Indians did nothing and accepted this position. No real effort was made to protest their anti-Hindu propaganda, denigration of Hindu culture, their exploitation of our resources and wealth, and what not until Gandhi. And then peaceful protest resulted Pakistan taking our historic land and turning it into a Muslim nation, a nation that secretly sanctions the sending of terrorists off on their merry way to slaughter infidels, and endorses anti-Indian and rhetoric. Much of their population hates Hindus and Indians. The Hindus there are the lowest class and are consistently given the lowest jobs regardless of their societal or educational standing. Did they go to war over this? No! Did they engage in slamming the other side? All those Hindus want is a better life and what did they get in return? What about today? Christian missionaries have field days with converting Hindus and teaching them to hate India and Hinduism. Did we go to war over this? No! Did we engage in slamming the other side? No! Western media and academia denigrates Hinduism on a daily basis. Did we go to war over this? No! Did we engage in slamming the other side? No! Only a small minority of Hindus, Hindus like SD and I, know or care about this. Hindus peacefully protested the anti-Hindu material (which had things like, “next time you see a monkey, worship it because it might be Hanuman!”) in California history books and the anti-Hindu ex-untouchables and Western scholars prevented the most crucial changes from taking place. Did we go to war over this? No! Did we engage in slamming the other side? NO!
Of course you got rights and recognition. You are all whites and follow a form of Christianity. In a rapidly developing world with the whites clearly being the superior race, it would have made little sense for whites to oppress whites (especially in a nation with segregation and harsh treatment of minorities and blacks).
Now, I am not advocating the opposite of peaceful protest and resistance. I am advocating that something else, in addition to peaceful protest, be done. This is in the form of intellectual awareness of the subversion of our culture.
Once again, let us not forget the words of a fellow “fighter” for rights and the abolishment of the racial status quo. “[B]I guess I should have realized that few members of a race that has oppressed another race can understand or appreciate the deep groans and passionate yearnings of those that have been oppressed and still fewer have the vision to see that injustice must be rooted out by strong, persistent, and determined action[/B].” - Martin Luther King.
Oh really? If you don’t occasionally point the finger and complain, then how do you expect people to notice your suffering and oppression? At this point, you are no worse than the racist clergymen who accused Martin Luther King’s actions as being inconsiderate, extremist, and untimely. And what do you think SD and I, as victims, are doing by taking the initiative and speaking out against all this oppression? But you are against even this kind of protest, so I am seriously starting to consider whether you really are biased against Hinduism and Indians.
Besides, MLK and Gandhi DID point fingers and point out the fact that the opposition was biased. Have you not been reading the quotes? Have you ever read “Letter from Birmingham Jail?” Besides, your religion IS the biggest obstacle in the progress of the world, or at least the way your religion has been for 2 millennia and is today. You, and most people, are just too politically correct to see that.
You are correct, not when it violates her personal freedoms. Then again, most Muslim women take pride in wearing a burqa so I do not understand why the West and Westerners says “we are bringing women’s rights to the M.E” and “Muslim women are oppressed daily.”
“Most of the Christians [B]I associate with[/B]…” The goodie-goodie ones who don’t really follow Christianity but a mix of Jesus/God worship and secular humanistic ideals? Most Christians, unfortunately, DO consider our beliefs as such as most Westerners in general scorn Hinduism because of these beliefs.
Then again, I think we should be upset with those Christian Eurocentrists when they are the ones that are responsible for teaching and endorsing those histories in textbooks we use even TODAY. I think we should be when these Christian Eurocentrists are the ones that are running the education system in India. I think we should be when these histories have successfully divided India on a North-South basis. I think we should be when these histories have been used to undermine our culture, nation, and religion in general and make it seem the product of foreign (white) input. I think we should be when our countless peaceful protests and resistance (which many Indians do by the way) to such histories are deemed “Hindutva” by those Christian Eurocentrists (who still refuse to change their views and who influence much of the historian community around the world today). In fact, we have been peacefully protesting and resisting for 1 century!
“Better keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.” (sarcasm) - Mark Twain